1980
DOI: 10.1016/0009-2509(80)85017-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of adsorbent particle size distribution on breakthrough curves for molecular sieve columns

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

1983
1983
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These calculated results are for assemblies of aggregates of one size only. Moharir et al (1980) and Rasmuson (1985a,b) have considered the process for a distribution of sizes. Tanton et al (1988a) used the analysis for spherical aggregates to predict the observed leaching from clods of clay soil and demonstrated the leaching of salts from restructured saline clay soils (Tanton et al, 1988b).…”
Section: Mode 1: Macropore and Micropore Regions Both Fully Saturatedmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These calculated results are for assemblies of aggregates of one size only. Moharir et al (1980) and Rasmuson (1985a,b) have considered the process for a distribution of sizes. Tanton et al (1988a) used the analysis for spherical aggregates to predict the observed leaching from clods of clay soil and demonstrated the leaching of salts from restructured saline clay soils (Tanton et al, 1988b).…”
Section: Mode 1: Macropore and Micropore Regions Both Fully Saturatedmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The PSD effects on the prediction of sorption uptake curves in a batch system have been investigated by Ruthven and Loughlin (1971) and later by Moharir et al (1980a) in an attempt to resolve the discrepancy between the theoretical and experimental sorption uptake curves. In those studies, the effects of a combined average particle size and size distribution were examined, and therefore the effects of the PSD alone might have been overestimated.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In those studies, the effects of a combined average particle size and size distribution were examined, and therefore the effects of the PSD alone might have been overestimated. The consideration of a PSD in the mathematical modeling for chromatographic columns appears to be first reported by Moharir et al (1980b) on the prediction of breakthrough curves from a zeolite column using a swelling crystal model to indirectly describe the zeolite crystal PSD. Since then, incorporating a PSD in the mathematical modeling has been reported by many investigators to determine adsorption and diffusion parameters (Hsu and Haynes, 1981;Bonifaceand Ruthven, 1985;Hyun and Danner, 1985;Fu et al, 1986).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The reaction rate constant and the particle tortuosity factor were estimated from experiments C2 to C4 (conducted with crushed particles) using eqs. (9) to (14). The estimated values are given in Table 9, together with the 95% confidence interval.…”
Section: C4mentioning
confidence: 99%