2002
DOI: 10.1046/j.1365-2915.2002.00381.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of adult nutrition on the melanization immune response of the malaria vector Anopheles stephensi

Abstract: Abstract. Two dietary resources À blood and sugar À were assessed for effects on the melanization immune response of the mosquito Anopheles stephensi Liston (Diptera: Culicidae) towards inoculated Sephadex beads (negatively charged C-25). This melanization is conferred by genetic factors capable of making the mosquito refractory to malaria parasites. If An. stephensi females had obtained a bloodmeal one day before inoculation with a bead, the efficacy of their immune response increased with the concentration o… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

5
59
0
1

Year Published

2006
2006
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 73 publications
(65 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
5
59
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The Drosophila medium prepared in the Cornell core facility (this study) is considerably richer that that utilized at Penn State (previous study), a difference that is readily apparent in the developmental time and fecundity of the flies (our unpublished observations). Nutritional state has previously been shown to play a role in the quality of immune response in Drosophila and other insects (e.g., Azambuja et al 1997;Suwanchaichinda and Paskewitz 1998;Vass and Nappi 1998;Koella and Sorense 2002;McKean and Nunney 2005) and may influence the genetic basis for variation in immunocompetence. By assaying the flies in nutrient-rich conditions, we may have inadvertently emphasized genetic differences in resource allocation and development, whereas the comparatively nutrient-poor conditions may have sensitized the previous assay to subtle differences in direct immune function.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Drosophila medium prepared in the Cornell core facility (this study) is considerably richer that that utilized at Penn State (previous study), a difference that is readily apparent in the developmental time and fecundity of the flies (our unpublished observations). Nutritional state has previously been shown to play a role in the quality of immune response in Drosophila and other insects (e.g., Azambuja et al 1997;Suwanchaichinda and Paskewitz 1998;Vass and Nappi 1998;Koella and Sorense 2002;McKean and Nunney 2005) and may influence the genetic basis for variation in immunocompetence. By assaying the flies in nutrient-rich conditions, we may have inadvertently emphasized genetic differences in resource allocation and development, whereas the comparatively nutrient-poor conditions may have sensitized the previous assay to subtle differences in direct immune function.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition to energy for flight, longevity, and reproduction, nutritional status also influences the immune melanization response of Anopheles mosquitoes (Suwanchaichinda and Paskewitz 1998;Koella and Sörensen 2002;Okech et al 2004) and susceptibility of Aedes mosquitoes to arbovirus (arthropod-borne virus) infection (Grimstad and Haramis 1984;Grimstad and Walker 1991;Nasci and Mitchell 1994). Mosquitoes can acquire arboviruses by imbibing infective blood meals from an infected vertebrate.…”
Section: Ale and Female Mosquitoes Ingest Plant Carbohydratesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition to their role in housekeeping protein synthesis, insects use large amounts of aromatic substrates during ecdysis (Sugumaran, 2000), cuticle hardening and tanning (Sugumaran and Nelson, 1998;Vincent, 2002), egg chorion formation (Li, 1994); wound healing (Galko and Krasnow, 2004;Shi et al, 2006), immunity (Siva-Jothy andThompson, 2002), melanotic encapsulation of pathogens (Hillyer et al, 2003;Koella and Sorensen, 2002), neurotransmission (Caveney and Donly, 2002;Osborne, 1996) and hormonal signaling (Gade and Goldsworthy, 2003;Kelly et al, 1994). Hence the demand for aromatic substrates is expected to be accompanied by an elevated expression of aromatic NATs.…”
Section: Role Of the Agnat6-agnat8 Duet In Secretory Epitheliamentioning
confidence: 99%