2001
DOI: 10.2307/3803107
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of Adult Sex Ratio on Mule Deer and Elk Productivity in Colorado

Abstract: Mule deer (Odocoileus hemionus) and elk (Cervus elaphus) in Colorado showed a decline in post-harvest youngfemale ratios during 1975-1995. One hypothesized cause of this decline in productivity is a decline in male:female ratios during the breeding period. We examined Colorado Division of Wildlife (CDOW) deer and elk population composition data obtained from helicopter surveys to see if sex ratios explained variation in young:female ratios. Data for both deer and elk supported a response of young: 100 females … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

1
40
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 45 publications
(41 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
1
40
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Although this is natural, widespread use of maleselective harvesting strategies is increasing the sex ratio skew in many such populations (Milner et al 2007). There is some evidence that decreasing the proportion of males in these systems can have negative effects on female reproduction (Bergerud 1974;Aitken and Child 1992;White et al 2001;Solberg et al 2002). Such effects can, for example, be caused by changes in the timing and synchrony of breeding at skewed sex ratios (Markgren 1974;CluttonBrock et al 1983CluttonBrock et al , 1987CluttonBrock et al , 1988Schwarz et al 1994;Taquet et al 1999;Mysterud et al 2002;Holand et al 2003;, a tendency among females to delay or even avoid breeding when they do not have access to preferred males (Komers et al 1999;Møller and Legendre 2001), or problems with mate finding (Berec et al 2001;Rankin and Kokko 2007).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Although this is natural, widespread use of maleselective harvesting strategies is increasing the sex ratio skew in many such populations (Milner et al 2007). There is some evidence that decreasing the proportion of males in these systems can have negative effects on female reproduction (Bergerud 1974;Aitken and Child 1992;White et al 2001;Solberg et al 2002). Such effects can, for example, be caused by changes in the timing and synchrony of breeding at skewed sex ratios (Markgren 1974;CluttonBrock et al 1983CluttonBrock et al , 1987CluttonBrock et al , 1988Schwarz et al 1994;Taquet et al 1999;Mysterud et al 2002;Holand et al 2003;, a tendency among females to delay or even avoid breeding when they do not have access to preferred males (Komers et al 1999;Møller and Legendre 2001), or problems with mate finding (Berec et al 2001;Rankin and Kokko 2007).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…This effect can be compounded, if there is an additional age bias in the harvest where hunters are removing large numbers of older males that typically do most of the breeding. The negative effects can be caused by changes in the timing and synchrony of breeding (White et al, 2001;Solberg et al, 2002), or females delaying or avoiding breeding because they are not able to find enough suitable mates (Ginsberg and Milner-Gulland, 1994;Komers et al, 1999;Møller and Legendre, 2001;Milner-Gulland et al, 2003).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Skewed ASRs have been linked to breeding behavior, social status, and the reproductive success of individuals (Murray, 1991;Clutton-Brock et al, 1997;Castro et al, 2004). ASRs are important indicators of a population's status and are a commonly used index for population management (White et al, 2001;Clutton-Brock et al, 2002;McLoughlin et al, 2005;Solberg et al, 2005). However for most species, little is known of the specific causes of annual variation in ASRs and the impacts they have on population dynamics (Le Galliard et al, 2005).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These strategies frequently result in skewed sex and age ratios at the population level [2]. Research on cervid species including moose ( Alces alces ) [3], [4] and mule deer ( Odocoileus hemionus ) [5], [6] has found little evidence to suggest that these reductions affect productivity, despite large changes to overall population composition. However, exceedingly female-biased sex ratios can have long term demographic and genetic effects on populations [7], [8], [9], [10], [11], and in some circumstances these effects can lead to declines in reproductive success [2], [8], [12] or calf survival and recruitment [7], [13], [14].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%