2012
DOI: 10.1186/1744-859x-11-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of age and disease on bone mass in Japanese patients with schizophrenia

Abstract: BackgroundThere have been a limited number of studies comparing bone mass between patients with schizophrenia and the general population. The aim of this study was to compare the bone mass of schizophrenia patients with that of healthy subjects in Japan.MethodsWe recruited patients (n = 362), aged 48.8 ± 15.4 (mean ± SD) years who were diagnosed with schizophrenia or schizoaffective disorder based on the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, fourth edition (DSM-IV). Bone mass was measured usin… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

1
14
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
1
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The overall pooled prevalence of osteoporosis in schizophrenia incorporating 17 studies ( n = 2671) was 13.2% [CI = 7.8–21.6%; Q = 299.79 , P ≤ 0.0001, I 2 = 94.6%]. Neither the Begg‐Mazumdar Kendall's τ (−0.117, P = 0.5) or the Egger's bias tests (−1.6, P = 0.3) demonstrated any evidence of publication bias.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 98%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…The overall pooled prevalence of osteoporosis in schizophrenia incorporating 17 studies ( n = 2671) was 13.2% [CI = 7.8–21.6%; Q = 299.79 , P ≤ 0.0001, I 2 = 94.6%]. Neither the Begg‐Mazumdar Kendall's τ (−0.117, P = 0.5) or the Egger's bias tests (−1.6, P = 0.3) demonstrated any evidence of publication bias.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…The initial electronic search yielded 689 valid hits and 19 studies were included in the meta‐analysis . At the full text viewing stage, we contacted the authors of 25 publications and, of these, eight studies were subsequently included (five authors provided additional data, see acknowledgements, and three authors did not respond, but contained sufficient data within the paper to enable inclusion), and 17 were excluded due to insufficient data.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations