1966
DOI: 10.1093/aesa/59.5.1024
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of Age, Nutrition, Sex, and Time of Day on Response of Boll Weevils to an Attractant from Cotton12

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

1969
1969
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Each sex was isolated in a separate rearing chamber at 13 h photophase, 25 ± 4 °C and 60 ± 10% RH until the bioassay. All food sources were removed on the third day, and beetles were maintained on water until they were used in the experiments when they were five days old, at which time they would be maximally responsive to semiochemicals 44 , 45 . At least 2 h before the experiment, beetles were isolated by sex and placed individually into 1.5 mL microtubes containing a small hole in the bottom and top to allow air flux during the semiochemical experiments and isolated by sex until the experiment.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Each sex was isolated in a separate rearing chamber at 13 h photophase, 25 ± 4 °C and 60 ± 10% RH until the bioassay. All food sources were removed on the third day, and beetles were maintained on water until they were used in the experiments when they were five days old, at which time they would be maximally responsive to semiochemicals 44 , 45 . At least 2 h before the experiment, beetles were isolated by sex and placed individually into 1.5 mL microtubes containing a small hole in the bottom and top to allow air flux during the semiochemical experiments and isolated by sex until the experiment.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Many endogenous factors, including age, physiological state, nutrition, and sex of the individual can affect behavioral responses (e.g., Hardee et al 1966;Hawkes & Coaker 1976). Exogenous factors including level of illumination (Sparks & Cheatham 1970), humidity (e.g., Traynier 1967), time of day (Hardee et al 1966), and even barometric pressure (Steinberg et al 1992) also may influence responses. Ultimately, the careful use of extensive controls, both positive and negative, is the best approach to identify and account for effects of such variables.…”
Section: General Considerations For Laboratory Bioassaysmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The active crude extract was tested in an olfactometer developed by Hardee et al, (1966). Hedin et al, (Pets.…”
Section: Field Plot Studies With Frego Bract Cottonsmentioning
confidence: 99%