2019
DOI: 10.7717/peerj.6255
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of agricultural land-use change on ant dominance hierarchy and food preferences in a temperate oak forest

Abstract: BackgroundThe discovery-dominance trade-off is the inverse relationship between the ability of a species to discover resources and the species’ dominance of those resources; a paradigm used to explain species coexistence in ant communities dependent on similar resources. However, factors such as stress (e.g., temperature) or disturbance (e.g., removal of biomass) associated with the change in land use, can modify this trade-off. Here, we aimed to determine the potential effects of land use change on dominance … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
13
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
1
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This is interesting given that this functional group is associated with sites with high levels of disturbance and stress; although some of these species are found only on agricultural land (D. insanus and F. densiventris), the majority were found in both vegetation types. The generalized Myrmicinae, which are associated with warm, open environments, were found in both vegetation types, although numerically they were better represented in agriculture land (Castillo-Guevara et al 2019). Of the 23 species of ants recorded in our study, 2 cold-climate specialist species were exclusively present in the oak forest, whereas 4 species that were opportunists, cold-climate specialists, and tropical climate specialists were collected exclusively from agricultural land (Table 1).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 77%
“…This is interesting given that this functional group is associated with sites with high levels of disturbance and stress; although some of these species are found only on agricultural land (D. insanus and F. densiventris), the majority were found in both vegetation types. The generalized Myrmicinae, which are associated with warm, open environments, were found in both vegetation types, although numerically they were better represented in agriculture land (Castillo-Guevara et al 2019). Of the 23 species of ants recorded in our study, 2 cold-climate specialist species were exclusively present in the oak forest, whereas 4 species that were opportunists, cold-climate specialists, and tropical climate specialists were collected exclusively from agricultural land (Table 1).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 77%
“…Microclimatic factors also disrupt dominance hierarchies. For instance, environmental variation in coffee systems is likely to influence dominance hierarchies (Philpott & Foster, 2005; Perfecto & Vandermeer, 2011; Castillo-Guevara et al, 2019). Occurrence of fire can disrupt dominance hierarchies in specialist ants in Acacia trees resulting in increased abundance of subordinate ants (Sensenig et al, 2017).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, Formica species dominating a boreal ecosystem divert resources away from subdominant competitors (Savolainen & Vepsäläinen, 1988). In Mediterranean ecosystems, subdominant species forage at nearly lethal environmental conditions while dominant species reduce their own mortality risk by foraging at more favorable temperatures (Cerdá, Retana & Manzaneda, 1998; Castillo-Guevara et al, 2019). In tropical ecosystems, competing arboreal ants can be structured into a dominance hierarchy with higher ranked ant species having greater access to nesting sites and extrafloral nectaries (Blüthgen, Stork & Fiedler, 2004; Díaz-Castelazo et al, 2004).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To evaluate the dominance hierarchy of MNP’s ants, we used the Dominance Index (DI) data that were calculated in a previous study at the same site from April to September of 2015 ( Castillo-Guevara et al, 2019 ). In this study, nine sampling points separated by 10 m were established in each transect.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Ant abundance was quantified using the frequency the species was reported in the pitfall traps to avoid overestimating the species that have more efficient recruitment systems (Gotelli et al, 2011). The average numerical DI was calculated for each ant species recorded in the previous study at MNP (Castillo-Guevara et al, 2019), and analyzed de novo in FBSP. The formula used was:…”
Section: Ant Abundance and Dominance Hierarchy Indicesmentioning
confidence: 99%