2022
DOI: 10.1186/s12887-022-03727-y
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of AI-assisted software on inter- and intra-observer variability for the X-ray bone age assessment of preschool children

Abstract: Background With the rapid development of deep learning algorithms and the rapid improvement of computer hardware in the past few years, AI-assisted diagnosis software for bone age has achieved good diagnostic performance. The purpose of this study was to investigate the effect of AI-assisted software on residents’ inter-observer agreement and intra-observer reproducibility for the X-ray bone age assessment of preschool children. Methods This prospe… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 25 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…HH-boneage.io, on the other hand, is a fully automatic system based on the TW3 method that predicts bone age with an MAE of 0.46 years and an RMSE of 0.62 years when compared to manual determination [17] (Table 2). Zhao et al [69] investigated the positive effects of AI-based software on inter-and intraobserver variability in a recent prospective study, in which six board-certified residents evaluated 56 left-hand wrist radiographs of pre-scholar children aged 3 to 6 years twice: once with and once without the assistance of artificial intelligence. Each resident evaluated the same images in the same way after 4 weeks.…”
Section: Ai-based Approachesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…HH-boneage.io, on the other hand, is a fully automatic system based on the TW3 method that predicts bone age with an MAE of 0.46 years and an RMSE of 0.62 years when compared to manual determination [17] (Table 2). Zhao et al [69] investigated the positive effects of AI-based software on inter-and intraobserver variability in a recent prospective study, in which six board-certified residents evaluated 56 left-hand wrist radiographs of pre-scholar children aged 3 to 6 years twice: once with and once without the assistance of artificial intelligence. Each resident evaluated the same images in the same way after 4 weeks.…”
Section: Ai-based Approachesmentioning
confidence: 99%