2007
DOI: 10.1016/j.snb.2006.06.025
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of air humidity on gas response of SnO2 thin film ozone sensors

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
63
2

Year Published

2010
2010
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 101 publications
(66 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
1
63
2
Order By: Relevance
“…We evaluated a larger (OH plus H 2 O) fraction by $10% for the sample SIC3 as compared to SIC1 and SIC2 beyond the errors in our relative concentrations assignments. This finding is consistent with our sensing measurements indicating SIC3 sample as the most sensitive material as well as in line with reliable results reported in the literature [29][30][31]. …”
Section: X-ray Photoelectron Spectroscopy (Xps)supporting
confidence: 94%
“…We evaluated a larger (OH plus H 2 O) fraction by $10% for the sample SIC3 as compared to SIC1 and SIC2 beyond the errors in our relative concentrations assignments. This finding is consistent with our sensing measurements indicating SIC3 sample as the most sensitive material as well as in line with reliable results reported in the literature [29][30][31]. …”
Section: X-ray Photoelectron Spectroscopy (Xps)supporting
confidence: 94%
“…The adsorption of water molecules on the surface of SnO 2 at low temperature results in the formation of donors attributed to hydroxyl groups bound to the Sn atoms, [ 37 ] which may partially offset the p-type response to H 2 gas in our ZnO-SnO 2 nanorod sensor. However, the hydroxyl groups begin to desorb at T > 200-250 ° C and are virtually absent at T > 400 ° C. [ 38 ] At high operating temperatures of 350 ° C, therefore, the p-type response to 100 ppm H 2 of our ZnO-SnO 2 nanorod sensor is still dominant as the infl uence of RH becomes insignifi cant. and was much thicker when compared to the Zn-O-Sn diffusion layer (as shown in Figure S3d).…”
Section: Sensing Mechanism Of Zno-modifi Ed Sno 2 Nanorod Sensormentioning
confidence: 88%
“…6-9 corresponds to the parameters of the SnO 2 gas sensors before any surface treatment. Detailed analysis of SnO 2 gas sensor parameters with an unmodified surface can be found in previously published articles [34][35][36][46][47][48][49].…”
Section: Gas Sensing Characteristicsmentioning
confidence: 99%