2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2016.09.010
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of Alirocumab on Lipoprotein(a) Over ≥1.5 Years (from the Phase 3 ODYSSEY Program)

Abstract: Elevated lipoprotein(a) [Lp(a)] is independently associated with increased cardiovascular risk. However, treatment options for elevated Lp(a) are limited. Alirocumab, a monoclonal antibody to proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin type 9, reduced low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) by up to 62% from baseline in phase 3 studies, with adverse event rates similar between alirocumab and controls. We evaluated the effect of alirocumab on serum Lp(a) using pooled data from the phase 3 ODYSSEY program: 4,915 … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

9
70
0
5

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 118 publications
(84 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
9
70
0
5
Order By: Relevance
“…Alirocumab also produced significant reductions in Lp(a), which has been proposed to be an independent cardiovascular risk factor; however, other commonly used lipid‐lowering strategies such as statins or ezetimibe have little or no effect on Lp(a) 39. The percentage reduction in Lp(a) observed in individuals with DM and ASCVD who were treated with alirocumab was similar to that observed in the overall alirocumab‐treated patient populations in the ODYSSEY trials,39 with the exception of the pool without statins. For the DM and ASCVD population, Lp(a) changes from baseline were −36.0% with alirocumab and +10.0% with ezetimibe, compared with −25.9% with alirocumab and −7.3% with ezetimibe in the overall population 25.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Alirocumab also produced significant reductions in Lp(a), which has been proposed to be an independent cardiovascular risk factor; however, other commonly used lipid‐lowering strategies such as statins or ezetimibe have little or no effect on Lp(a) 39. The percentage reduction in Lp(a) observed in individuals with DM and ASCVD who were treated with alirocumab was similar to that observed in the overall alirocumab‐treated patient populations in the ODYSSEY trials,39 with the exception of the pool without statins. For the DM and ASCVD population, Lp(a) changes from baseline were −36.0% with alirocumab and +10.0% with ezetimibe, compared with −25.9% with alirocumab and −7.3% with ezetimibe in the overall population 25.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Clinical studies show that use of the two PCSK9 antibodies alirocumab and evolocumab potently lowers Lp(a) [31, 72, 81], the latter also in patients with type 2 diabetes [77]. Interestingly, PSCK9 inhibition reduces Lp(a) in patient with homozygous familial hypercholesterolemia despite their lack or dysfunction of the LDLR.…”
Section: Studies Of Pcsk9-inhibition In Patients With High Cardiovascmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In contrast to their impressive potential on LDL-cholesterol, the influence on Lp (a) is markedly lower; a lowering of Lp (a) levels by up to 30% has been reported, the reduction rate is below 20% in patients with high levels of Lp (a) [14, 15]. …”
Section: Therapeutic Options In Hyperlipoproteinemia (A)mentioning
confidence: 99%