2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.surfcoat.2013.04.018
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of alloy composition on the oxide scale formation and electrical conductivity behavior of Co-plated ferritic alloys

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
2
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
1
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Similar to Cr, some Fe also di used outward from the substrate to the coating. According to the EDS results, the di usion distance of Fe was further than that of Cr at the same time, implying that the di usivity of Fe is greater than that of Cr, which agrees with the data in the literature [18]. With the extended conversion time, Fe was more uniformly dispersed in the coating.…”
Section: Phase Structures In the Converted Coatingssupporting
confidence: 90%
“…Similar to Cr, some Fe also di used outward from the substrate to the coating. According to the EDS results, the di usion distance of Fe was further than that of Cr at the same time, implying that the di usivity of Fe is greater than that of Cr, which agrees with the data in the literature [18]. With the extended conversion time, Fe was more uniformly dispersed in the coating.…”
Section: Phase Structures In the Converted Coatingssupporting
confidence: 90%
“…At 800°C, the bare substrate had a moderate scale ASR of 24 mΩ·cm 2 , while the (Co,Mn) 3 O 4 coated sample had a much lower ASR of 13 mΩ·cm 2 , which likely was due to the reduction in contact resistance with the presence of the highly-conductive spinel layer [33]. Moreover, with the addition of CeO 2 in the spinel layer, the ASR of the oxide scale was further reduced to 8 mΩ·cm 2 , which is among the lowest values of ASR reported for SOFC interconnect coatings on Cr 2 O 3 -forming alloys [24][25][26][33][34][35][36]. The significant reduction in ASR with the CeO 2 -doped coating could be attributed to the smaller thickness of the Cr 2 O 3 layer, which is much more electrically resistive than the spinel.…”
Section: Microstructures Before and After Thermal Conversionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Spinel coating has the high conductivity, and its thermal expansion coefficient is matching with ferritic stainless steel. Therefore it shows good application prospects to reduce the growth of Cr2O3 film on stainless steel [9][10][11]. The electroplating method for spinel coatings is to pre-deposit a metal or alloy layer on a stainless steel substrate, and then to form a spinel coating by high temperature oxidation treatment.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%