1974
DOI: 10.1021/ja00810a051
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of .alpha.-methyl groups on the photochemistry of 3,4,5,6,7,8-hexahydronaphthalen-2(1H)-one

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
14
0

Year Published

1974
1974
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, this selectivity is not universal, and the reasons for this are not fully understood. In some cases the [1,3]-acyl shift product is also formed on triplet sensitization, while the ODPM rearrangement product has been observed on direct photolysis of certain enones. Nowadays it is generally accepted that the [1,3]-acyl shift occurs from an nπ* excited state in either the singlet (S 1 ) or triplet (T 2 ) manifold, while the ODPM rearrangement originates from the slightly lower energy triplet ππ* state (T 1 ) where the excitation is localized on the alkene moiety. , The energy difference between the two triplet states is thought to be as little as 2 kcal mol -1 . Both rearrangements have been the subject of several reviews, 12a,, and the possible reaction mechanisms have been summarized in Scheme .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, this selectivity is not universal, and the reasons for this are not fully understood. In some cases the [1,3]-acyl shift product is also formed on triplet sensitization, while the ODPM rearrangement product has been observed on direct photolysis of certain enones. Nowadays it is generally accepted that the [1,3]-acyl shift occurs from an nπ* excited state in either the singlet (S 1 ) or triplet (T 2 ) manifold, while the ODPM rearrangement originates from the slightly lower energy triplet ππ* state (T 1 ) where the excitation is localized on the alkene moiety. , The energy difference between the two triplet states is thought to be as little as 2 kcal mol -1 . Both rearrangements have been the subject of several reviews, 12a,, and the possible reaction mechanisms have been summarized in Scheme .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is at variance with the results obtained by Luibrand et al12 in their sensitized irradiation of bicyclic octenone 11 , which generated a DPM photoproduct. The presence of the methyl group at the bridgehead carbon atom may have enhanced the reactivity of the α‐cleavage process that may occur during singlet (S 1 , n,π*) or triplet (T 2 , n,π*) excitation by stabilization of the incipient radical generated at the bridgehead carbon atom 2,20,26b. Interestingly, the bicyclodienones 1b and 1c did not undergo rearrangement under triplet‐sensitization conditions.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The magnitude of the upfield shift upon Z → E isomerization is larger than that in the methyl and ethyl analogues . Irradiation of 4b Z at ambient temperature and 313 nm in acetone- d 6 as solvent and triplet sensitizer exhibited the same rearrangement quantum yield as in toluene- d 8 . Irradiationof 4b Z in toluene at −53 °C in the ESR cavity led to a weak signal about 50 G wide consisting of 13 peaks, which were much broader than those from 4a .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 89%