2015
DOI: 10.2134/jeq2014.09.0404er
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of Alum Additions to Poultry Litter on In-House Ammonia and Greenhouse Gas Concentrations and Emissions

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

2
3
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

1
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
2
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The pH gradually increased during the incubation period to ∼5.8, compared with 9.1 for the unamended, after 3 mo of incubation. This acidifying effect of alum was expected, as shown elsewhere (Eugene et al., 2015; Line, 2002; Moore, Daniel, & Edwards, 2000). This acidifying effect is also the basis for its use as an amendment in chicken houses to reduce water‐soluble phosphorus and NH 3 volatilization from poultry houses at lower rates (5–10%) (Gilmour et al., 2004; Moore et al., 2000), compared with 15% in our study.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 84%
“…The pH gradually increased during the incubation period to ∼5.8, compared with 9.1 for the unamended, after 3 mo of incubation. This acidifying effect of alum was expected, as shown elsewhere (Eugene et al., 2015; Line, 2002; Moore, Daniel, & Edwards, 2000). This acidifying effect is also the basis for its use as an amendment in chicken houses to reduce water‐soluble phosphorus and NH 3 volatilization from poultry houses at lower rates (5–10%) (Gilmour et al., 2004; Moore et al., 2000), compared with 15% in our study.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 84%
“…The NH 3 emission rates for broilers varied from 0.09 to 0.43 g day À1 bird À1 in European countries ( Table 2). The average NH 3 emission rate obtained in the present study (0.13 g NH 3 day À1 bird À1 ) was comparable with values reported by Nicholson et al (2004) in UK and Guiziou and B eline (2005) Eugene et al (2015) in USA and by Calvet et al (2011) in Spain (0.049e0.051 g N 2 O day À1 bird À1 ), but much larger than those reported by Guiziou and B eline (2005) in France and by Wiedemann et al (2016) in Australia (0e0.007 g N 2 O day À1 bird À1 ) ( Table 2). …”
Section: Ammonia Emissionssupporting
confidence: 92%
“…As can be observed in Eugene et al (2015) in USA and Roumeliotis et al (2010) in Canada (0.414e0.753 g CH 4 day À1 bird À1 ) and higher than emission rate reported by Calvet et al (2011) in Spain and by Guiziou and B eline (2005) …”
Section: Ammonia Emissionsmentioning
confidence: 64%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…However, excessive PL applications may cause soil P accumulation and decrease the P sorption capacity, which promote leaching of the nutrients to subsurface waters (Abdala, Ghosh, Silva, Novais, & Alvarez-Venegas, 2012) and base leaching in the soil profile, probably due to the presence of malic and oxalic acid in organic manure (Gebrim et al, 2008). Furthermore, ammonia (NH 3 -N), and greenhouse gases can be released with PL application and can contribute to environmental contamination (Eugene et al, 2015). To prevent P accumulation from organic nutrient sources, it is necessary to use complementary N sources such as N-fixing or N-rich fertilizers to balance P budgets (Maltais-Landry, Scow, Brennan, Torbert, & Vitousek, 2016).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%