2009
DOI: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2008.07.030
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of amended soil and hydraulic load on enhanced biological nitrogen removal in lab-scale SWIS

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

2
24
2

Year Published

2012
2012
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 40 publications
(28 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
2
24
2
Order By: Relevance
“…As shown in Table 1, HLR had obviously negative influence on the pollutants removal in the pilot system except for TN. inconsistent with previous studies, which declared that the average removal efficiency of TN will decrease with the increase of HLR (Li et al, 2012;Zou et al, 2009). It is probably due to the more available carbon source in the lower layer (TOC concentration in effluent A3) at 0.5 m 3 /m 2 d, which may lead to higher denitrification and result in lower effluent TN.…”
Section: Effect Of Hydraulic Loading Ratecontrasting
confidence: 76%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…As shown in Table 1, HLR had obviously negative influence on the pollutants removal in the pilot system except for TN. inconsistent with previous studies, which declared that the average removal efficiency of TN will decrease with the increase of HLR (Li et al, 2012;Zou et al, 2009). It is probably due to the more available carbon source in the lower layer (TOC concentration in effluent A3) at 0.5 m 3 /m 2 d, which may lead to higher denitrification and result in lower effluent TN.…”
Section: Effect Of Hydraulic Loading Ratecontrasting
confidence: 76%
“…2, after the start-up period, the TN removal efficiency was nearly zero. After day 88, the average removal rate of TN increased to 13.8%, which was lower than the conventional SWIS (20-35%) and other modified SWIS (40-85%) (Zou et al, 2009;Pan et al, 2015). More than 65% TOC was biodegraded within the 0-35 cm substrate in the infiltration systems, leading to carbon source scarceness in the low layer for denitrification process (Table 1).…”
Section: Overall Performance Of the Swismentioning
confidence: 95%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…However, without denitrification, NO x À -N remains in solution and is transported in the percolate because it is not held by exchange reactions. Denitrification in the conventional SWIS is usually affected by the denitrifying biomass, temperature, soil characteristics, the carbon source and the carbon/nitrogen ratio (Sun et al, 1998;Xia et al, 2008;Yamaguchi et al, 1996;Zhang et al, 2005Zou et al, 2009. Furthermore, decomposition of organic matter and nitrification mainly occur in the upper portion, where oxygen is adequate.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%