2002
DOI: 10.1016/s0378-5173(01)00969-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of an external resistance to airflow on the inspiratory flow curve

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
35
0

Year Published

2003
2003
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 48 publications
(39 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
2
35
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Most commercially available asthma inhalers have a resistance between those of the 4-and 7-mm resistors, including the Turbuhaler (AstraZeneca, Sweden), Diskhaler (Glaxo Welcome, UK), and Diskus (GlaxoSmithKline, UK) (20) (Fig. 5).…”
Section: Inhaler Resistance Effect On Inspiration Of Cf Patientsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Most commercially available asthma inhalers have a resistance between those of the 4-and 7-mm resistors, including the Turbuhaler (AstraZeneca, Sweden), Diskhaler (Glaxo Welcome, UK), and Diskus (GlaxoSmithKline, UK) (20) (Fig. 5).…”
Section: Inhaler Resistance Effect On Inspiration Of Cf Patientsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(10) Added inspiratory resistance generally decreases PIF rate for both breathing maneuvers performed at rest and during exercise. (1,(22)(23)(24) Under heavy external work conditions of 181, 226, and 271 W, Silverman et al (25) reported average PIF rates of 194, 254, and 286 L · min −1 without any applied breathing resistance. However, with added resistances (4.5 cm H 2 O · L −1 · sec inspiratory and 2.9 cm H 2 O · L −1 · sec expiratory resistance) average PIF rates were 160, 192, and 240 L · min −1 , indicating that PIF decreases between 16 and 24% for resistances representative of air-purifying respirators.…”
Section: Respirator Inhalation Resistancementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Previous studies on effects of inhalation maneuver on DPI performance were focused on measuring particle size at the inhaler outlet using realistic inhalation profiles (Bisgaard et al, 1998;Clark & Bailey, 1996;De Boer et al, 1997;De Koning, Van der Mark, Coenegracht, Tromp, & Frijlink, 2002;Finlay & Gehmlich, 2000;Kamin et al, 2002). Based on these data, it is acknowledged that valid DPI testing should take into consideration realistic inhalation profiles, as opposed to standardized cascade impactor tests, where a fixed flow rate is used.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%