Effect of angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors and angiotensin II receptor blockers on cardiovascular events in patients with heart failure: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

Abstract

BackgroundHeart failure (HF) remains a significant cause of morbidity and mortality. Multiple trials over the past several years have examined the effects of both angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEIs) and angiotensin II receptor blockers (ARBs) in the treatment of left ventricular dysfunction, both acutely after myocardial infarction and in chronic heart failure. Yet, there is still confusion regarding the relative efficacy of rennin-angiotensin-aldosterone system (RAAS) inhibition. Our study was conducted to assess efficacy of ACEIs and ARBs in reducing all-cause and cardiovascular mortality in heart failure patients.MethodsWe included randomized clinical trials compared ACEIs and ARBs treatment (any dose or type) with placebo treatment, no treatment, or other anti-HF drugs treatment, reporting cardiovascular or total mortality with an observation period of at least 12 months. Data sources included Pubmed, EMBASE, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials. Dichotomous outcome data from individual trials were analyzed using the risk ratio measure and its 95%CI with random-effects/ fixed-effects models. We performed meta-regression analyses to identify sources of heterogeneity. All-cause mortality and CV mortality were thought to be the main outcomes.ResultsA total of 47,662 subjects were included with a mean/median follow-up ranged from 12 weeks to 4.5 years. Of all 38 studies, 32 compared ACEIs with control therapy (included 13 arms that compared ACEIs with placebo, 10 arms in which the comparator was active treatment and 9 arms that compared ACEIs with ARBs), and six studies compared ARBs with placebo. ACEIs treatment in patients with HF reduced all-cause mortality to 11% (risk ratio (RR): 0.89, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.83–0.96, p = 0.001) and the corresponding value for cardiovascular mortality was 14% (RR: 0.86, 95% CI: 0.78–0.94, p = 0.001). However, ARBs had no beneficial effect on reducing all-cause and cardiovascular mortality. In head-to-head analysis, ACEIs was not superior to ARBs for all-cause mortality and cardiovascular deaths.ConclusionsIn HF patients, ACEIs, but not ARBs reduced all-cause mortality and cardiovascular deaths. Thus, ACEIs should be considered as first-line therapy to limit excess mortality and morbidity in this population.Electronic supplementary materialThe online version of this article (10.1186/s12872-017-0686-z) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

Ceruloplasmin, NT-proBNP, and Clinical Data as Risk Factors of Death or Heart Transplantation in a 1-Year Follow-Up of Heart Failure Patients

“…Referring to guideline-based therapy, patient treatment in our study was considered to be optimized by the physicians [25]. Although we did not analyze the reasons for not using this treatment, in most cases there were contraindications to the use of this therapy.…”

Angiotensin II receptor blockers are safe in patients with prior angioedema related to angiotensin‐converting enzyme inhibitors – a nationwide registry‐based cohort study

“…Due to the risk of this severe adverse reaction, it could be discussed whether AT2s should replace ACEis in some circumstances. However, in patients with heart failure ACEis reduces the mortality rate significantly, whereas AT2s do not . No head‐to‐head trials have assessed the effect of AT2s versus ACEis on morbidity or mortality in patients with diabetic nephropathy.…”

New drugs and new toxicities: pembrolizumab-induced myocarditis

“…Acute renal failure has been designated as a potential problem with ECMO in such patients that should not be overlooked 21. ACE inhibitors can be employed to decrease heart failure-related morbidity and mortality 22. A rapid recovery is usually observed with the corticosteroid treatment 23.…”