2011
DOI: 10.1103/physrevb.83.165413
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of annealing and applied bias on barrier shape in CoFe/MgO/CoFe tunnel junctions

Abstract: Energy-filtered transmission electron microscopy and electron holography were used to study changes in the MgO tunnel barrier of CoFe/MgO/CoFe magnetic tunnel junctions as a function of annealing and in-situ applied electrical bias. Annealing was found to increase the homogeneity and crystallinity of the MgO tunnel barrier. Cobalt, oxygen and trace amounts of iron diffused into the MgO upon annealing. Annealing also resulted in a reduction of the tunneling barrier height, and decreased the resistance of the an… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 68 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…An 80 nm MgO layer was first deposited at 450°C in an Ar-O 2 mixture. This temperature is close to the optimal annealing temperatures in usual MgO-based tunnel junctions [22].…”
Section: Device Preparation and Characterizationmentioning
confidence: 90%
“…An 80 nm MgO layer was first deposited at 450°C in an Ar-O 2 mixture. This temperature is close to the optimal annealing temperatures in usual MgO-based tunnel junctions [22].…”
Section: Device Preparation and Characterizationmentioning
confidence: 90%
“…Annealing is found to decrease the resistance of the junction, although the effective barrier layer width expands. 47 This paradox is usually explained as being due to a reduction of the density of oxygen vacancies, though the resulting similarities with the Mg insertion layer case might point to their common origin. Please note that Mg can diffuse easily at the temperatures involved here, producing a Mg enrichment at the MgO surface.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Figure 3 shows typical bias voltage dependences of differential resistance (dV/dI) and TMR for a MTJ at 5 K. The asymmetric TMR and dV/dI curves suggest that barrier profile is asymmetric. 30,31 At negative biases electrons are injected from the bottom electrode into the top one. Asymmetry can be ascribed to the poor quality of the upper MgO/CoFe interface presumably due to the propagation of the stacking faults, dislocations, and the lattice distortion.…”
Section: Copyright 2012 Author(s) This Article Is Distributed Under mentioning
confidence: 99%