2023
DOI: 10.1016/j.foodchem.2022.134153
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of annealing treatment on the physicochemical properties and enzymatic hydrolysis of different types of starch

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
13
1

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
0
13
1
Order By: Relevance
“…1 (D–F), pearling did not significantly change the starting temperature (T o ), peak temperature (T p ) and ending temperature (T c ) of HBF of the three varieties. The ΔH value decreased slightly (P ≥ 0.05) except QB13 at 8 % PR, which could be attributed to the increase of not gelatinized starch ( Zheng et al, 2022 ). Pearling treatment decreased the water bound to the dietary fiber, which might increase the water transmission rate in the gelatinization system and accelerate the gelatinization process of starch ( Wang et al, 2022 ).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…1 (D–F), pearling did not significantly change the starting temperature (T o ), peak temperature (T p ) and ending temperature (T c ) of HBF of the three varieties. The ΔH value decreased slightly (P ≥ 0.05) except QB13 at 8 % PR, which could be attributed to the increase of not gelatinized starch ( Zheng et al, 2022 ). Pearling treatment decreased the water bound to the dietary fiber, which might increase the water transmission rate in the gelatinization system and accelerate the gelatinization process of starch ( Wang et al, 2022 ).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…These outcomes can be ascribed to the enhanced interplay between amylose molecules and/or amyloseamylopectin, coupled with the elevation in perfect crystalline architecture during ANN (Zheng et al, 2023). These structural changes make it more challenging for enzymes to penetrate and hydrolyze starch internally (Su et al, 2020).…”
Section: In Vitro Digestibilitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…ANN may disrupt the least stable structures of starch, leading to recrystallization or rearrangement of starch molecular chains (Guo et al, 2020). ANN can also enhance the gelatinization characteristics of starch (Chi et al, 2019), reduce its swelling power and solubility (Yadav et al, 2013), and strengthen the microcrystalline structure of starch, making it di cult for enzymes to penetrate and hydrolyze starch internally, thus reducing the rate of starch hydrolysis (Zheng et al, 2023). However, the effects of ANN on starch vary depending on the sources.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Based on the in vitro digestibility determined through the hydrolysis of starch by a mixture of α-amylase and amyloglucosidase, starch can be classified into rapid digestible starch (RDS, completely digested within 20 min), slowly digestible starch (SDS, digested between 20 and 120 min), very-slowly digestible starch (Very-SDS, digested between 120 min and 16 h), and resistant starch (RS, not fully digested in 16 h) [20]. Though much previous literature has demonstrated the effects of ANN on resistant starch content, the outcome actually depends on the starch source and annealing conditions [14,[17][18][19][20]24,27,33,38]. Table 5 showed the effect of continuous and cycled ANN treatments on the in vitro digestibility of water caltrop starch.…”
Section: In-vitro Digestibilitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…During ANN, the excess water penetrates the soft amorphous regions and improves alignments by providing necessary chain mobility and movements of the double helices throughout annealing [12,13]. It also contributes to limited but reversible swelling of the starch granules, which allows for mobility in the crystalline domains [14]. The influence of annealing on starch depends on the starch source and annealing conditions [15].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%