2017
DOI: 10.14411/eje.2017.015
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of ant attendance on aphid population growth and above ground biomass of the aphid's host plant

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

1
7
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 45 publications
1
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Ant care is influenced by the quality (composition) and quantity of the honeydew (Völkl, Woodring, Fischer, Lorenz, & Hoffmann, 1999;Katayama & Suzuki, 2002), which indicates that a larger colony may be more tractive to be attended by ants. However, studies carried out by Hosseini et al, (2017), indicate that regardless of the initial size of the colony, this interaction generates an increase in the density of the colony and the growth rate is higher compared to the unattended colonies. On the other hand, aphids in small colonies invest more energy supplying the supply of honeydew for ants; in large colonies, this effort is less because more individuals contribute to supply the demand for this substance (Katayama & Suzuki, 2002).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Ant care is influenced by the quality (composition) and quantity of the honeydew (Völkl, Woodring, Fischer, Lorenz, & Hoffmann, 1999;Katayama & Suzuki, 2002), which indicates that a larger colony may be more tractive to be attended by ants. However, studies carried out by Hosseini et al, (2017), indicate that regardless of the initial size of the colony, this interaction generates an increase in the density of the colony and the growth rate is higher compared to the unattended colonies. On the other hand, aphids in small colonies invest more energy supplying the supply of honeydew for ants; in large colonies, this effort is less because more individuals contribute to supply the demand for this substance (Katayama & Suzuki, 2002).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Studies carried out by Hosseini et al, (2017) and de Siqueira, Fagundes, Sperber and Fernandes (2011), indicate that this ant aphid interaction generates positive effects on the yield and biomass production of crop plants, among others, because the spread of microorganisms is prevented by avoiding the accumulation of aphid secretions, and the abundance of other herbivores is reduced. The interaction between A. gossypii and ants is of interest in biological control because ants interfere in the predation of this aphid by aphidophagous generalists, such as Hippodamia convergens Guérin-Méneville, 1842 (Coleoptera: Coccinellidae) and Chrysoperla carnea (Stephens) (Neuroptera: Chrysopidae) (Kaplan & Eubanks, 2002;Powell & Silverman, 2010a).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Because of the protection and hygienic care provided by workers, the population of ant‐tended aphids usually grow faster than unattended aphid colonies, thus suggesting mutual benefits for both partners (El‐Ziady & Kennedy, 1956; Buckley, 1987; Flatt & Weisser, 2000; Hosseini et al ., 2017). However, the truly mutualistic nature of this relationship can be questioned in some cases.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These interactions are common and conspicuous in terrestrial communities from tropical to temperate regions (Buckley, 1987;Hölldobler and Wilson, 1990;Delabie, 2001;Styrsky and Eubanks, 2007). These associations trigger the dynamics of ecological communities by influencing the environmental variables, species evolution and survival rate (Bronstein, 2009;Hosseini et al, 2017). One classic example of mutualistic relationship are the interactions between aphids and ants (Darwin, 1859;Stadler and Dixon, 2005).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%