2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2012.10.017
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of anterior–posterior and internal–external motion restraint during knee wear simulation on a posterior stabilised knee design

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Furthermore, our study showed that a tight PCL leads to a higher stress on the inlay and more anterior-posterior movement. These two factors might increase the polyethylene wear in knee prostheses [33,34]. Even collateral ligament stress was diminished with an increasing release of the PCL from certain degree of flexion, which can be explained with less anterior translation of the tibia.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, our study showed that a tight PCL leads to a higher stress on the inlay and more anterior-posterior movement. These two factors might increase the polyethylene wear in knee prostheses [33,34]. Even collateral ligament stress was diminished with an increasing release of the PCL from certain degree of flexion, which can be explained with less anterior translation of the tibia.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These more lax ligament characteristics are comparable to ligament characteristics defined in this study, despite both approaches (ISO and this study) replicating different ligament conditions. However, only limited published data is available for wear testing according to the newly introduced ISO standard [32, 47]. Haider et al [47] reported a high wear rate of 19.88 mg/10 6 cycles for a posterior-stabilized design without reporting the resulting kinematics.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Haider et al [47] reported a high wear rate of 19.88 mg/10 6 cycles for a posterior-stabilized design without reporting the resulting kinematics. Recently, Grupp et al [32] tested the wear behavior of a posterior-stabilized knee design, comparing the old ISO standard to the recently introduced one. A wear rate more than three times higher was reported when comparing the new to the old ISO standard.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The restraint characteristics of the ankle and comparison to TKR show the high relevance of intact ligament structures on the functionality of the joint. Intact ligament structures may not only help to stabilize TAR, but also help to reduce PE wear due to reduced secondary motions of the joint [90].…”
Section: Wear Testmentioning
confidence: 99%