Effect of Antipredator Training on Spatial Behaviour of Male and Female Greater Rheas<i>Rhea americana</i>Reintroduced Into the Wild

Cortez, Marilina Vera; Navarro, Joaquín L.; Martella, Mónica B.

doi:10.3161/00016454ao2018.53.1.008

Cited by 4 publications

(4 citation statements)

References 41 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…Jenis burung ini berasal dari keluarga Rheidae yang telah tercantum dalam Appendix II CITES dan telah dikategorikan sebagai hewan hampir terancam (near theatened) oleh International Union for Conservation of Nature (IUCN) [5] Burung rhea merupakan burung besar yang tidak bisa terbang, dengan tinggi antara 93-140 cm dan berat 22-28 kg. Burung rhea secara alami menghuni padang rumpu dan semak terbuka, tetapi mereka juga dapat hidup di habitat lain seperti sabana, hutan terbuka, lahan bersemak, rawa, lahan pertanian, dan hutan taman [6] Selain hidup di habitat aslinya, burung rhea diketahui dapat beradaptasi dengan daerah pertanian maju yang kaya akan pangan seperti di Agentina dan Brazil. Burung ini menyukai daerah yang terbuka dengan air dan vegetasi yang lebih rendah dari 50 cm.…”

Section: Pendahuluanunclassified

PERILAKU HARIAN BURUNG RHEA (Rhea americana) DI BONTOMARANNU EDUCATION PARK KABUPATEN GOWA

Nurmayanti¹

2022

Preprint

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Perilaku merupapakan aktivitas suatu makhluk hidup yang dilakukan berulang-ulang. Pengamatan perilaku harian yang dilakukan di Bontomarannu Education Park selama dua kali pengamatan dengan menggunakan metode scan animal sampling dengan tujuan untuk mengetahui perilaku harian Burung Rhea (Rhea americana) yang ada di Bontomarannu Education Park dengan hasil berupa aktivitas makan, minum, berjalan, mencari makan, merapikan bulu, termoregulasi, bermain, vokalisasi, dan courtship.

show abstract

Section: Pendahuluanunclassified

PERILAKU HARIAN BURUNG RHEA (Rhea americana) DI BONTOMARANNU EDUCATION PARK KABUPATEN GOWA

Nurmayanti¹

2022

Preprint

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…[57,58]), or by hindering it (e.g. [59,60]), and may also shape the movement routes of migrating animals [61,62].…”

Section: Interspecific Avoidance Inductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Invisible barriers: anthropogenic impacts on inter- and intra-specific interactions as drivers of landscape-independent fragmentation

Berger‐Tal

Saltz

2019

Phil. Trans. R. Soc. B

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Anthropogenically induced fragmentation constitutes a major threat to biodiversity. Presently, conservation research and actions focus predominantly on fragmentation caused directly by physical transformation of the landscape (e.g. deforestation, agriculture, urbanization, roads, etc.). While there is no doubt that landscape features play a key role in fragmenting populations or enhancing connectivity, fragmentation may also come about by processes other than the transformation of the landscape and which may not be readily visible. Such landscape-independent fragmentation (LIF) usually comes about when anthropogenic disturbance alters the inter- and intra-specific interactions among and within species. LIF and its drivers have received little attention in the scientific literature and in the management of wildlife populations. We discuss three major classes of LIF processes and their relevance for the conservation and management of species and habitats: (i) interspecific dispersal dependency, in which populations of species that rely on other species for transport and propagation become fragmented as the transporting species declines; (ii) interspecific avoidance induction, where species are excluded from habitats and corridors owing to interspecific interactions resulting from anthropogenically induced changes in community structure (e.g. exclusions by increased predation pressure); and (iii) intraspecific behavioural divergence, where populations become segregated owing to anthropogenically induced behavioural differentiation among them. This article is part of the theme issue ‘Linking behaviour to dynamics of populations and communities: application of novel approaches in behavioural ecology to conservation'.

show abstract

“…Apart from using information from their immediate environment, animals can also use their past experiences to inform their expectation of risk and modulate their current antipredator behaviour. For example, snakes that are captured before are more likely to flee during the second capture (Gregory, 2013), zebrafish react faster to a predatory stimulus as they accumulate experience (Dill, 1974), and female Greater rheas trained with visual predator cues reduce their movement in the wild (Cortez et al, 2018).…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Don’t Leave the Past Behind: How Larval Experience Shapes Pupal Antipredator Response inAedes aegypti

Rawat,

Bhambore,

Isvaran

2024

Preprint

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Animals use predation encounters or risk experiences to influence their future antipredator responses. Such carryover effects of predation can benefit them by enhancing their antipredator behaviour and thereby decreasing their risk of mortality through predation. Despite these fitness benefits, behavioural carryovers of predation past may not be a common phenomenon in complex life cycles. Complex life cycles pose a unique evolutionary and physiological challenge to behavioural carryovers since every life stage is distinct in morphology, physiology, and function. Each life stage of a complex life cycle is expected to evolve its independent response based on the real-time threat level and manage the trade-offs accordingly. Along with the evolutionary challenge, physiological barriers can hamper behavioural carryovers, especially in holometabolous insects, where we observe extensive tissue remodelling and developmental compartmentalisation. We investigated behavioural carryover in the holometabolous mosquito model system,Aedes aegypti. We asked whether predation risk during a life stage carries over to the subsequent stage, influencing its behaviour, or if the next life stage responds according to its threat environment.Aedes aegyptihas four major stages– egg, larva, pupa, and adult. We examined the effect of predation-risk experience across larval and pupal stages. Larval and pupal stages differ in morphology, physiology and function. They share the same habitat and, therefore, similar threats. We manipulated the threat of predation experienced by larvae and investigated its influence on pupal behaviour. We found behavioural carryover in the pupal stage for the first time and discovered exciting interactions between past experiences and the current threat environment. Our study underscores the crucial role of predation pressure in shaping the evolution of complex life cycles, emphasising the significance of early experiences with predators in influencing behavioural traits across distinct life stages.

show abstract

Effect of Antipredator Training on Spatial Behaviour of Male and Female Greater RheasRhea americanaReintroduced Into the Wild

Abstract: Effect of antipredator training on spatial behaviour of male and female Greater Rheas Rhea americana reintroduced into the wild. Acta Ornithol.

Cited by 4 publications

References 41 publications

PERILAKU HARIAN BURUNG RHEA (Rhea americana) DI BONTOMARANNU EDUCATION PARK KABUPATEN GOWA

PERILAKU HARIAN BURUNG RHEA (Rhea americana) DI BONTOMARANNU EDUCATION PARK KABUPATEN GOWA

Invisible barriers: anthropogenic impacts on inter- and intra-specific interactions as drivers of landscape-independent fragmentation

Don’t Leave the Past Behind: How Larval Experience Shapes Pupal Antipredator Response inAedes aegypti

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About