1990
DOI: 10.1111/j.1559-1816.1990.tb01494.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of Applicant's Clothing on Interviewer's Decision to Hire

Abstract: This research investigated the extent to which an applicant's clothing influenced interviewer's perceptions of management Characteristics and deasions to hire women for management positions. One hundred nine respondents (from marketing and banking) viewed color videotapes of four women applicants interviewing for a management position. The applicants were wearing one of four experimental costumes which differed in masculinity. The respondents rated each applicant on five management characteristics and made hir… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
68
2
3

Year Published

1994
1994
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
4
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 77 publications
(74 citation statements)
references
References 47 publications
1
68
2
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Teaching assistants who wear formal clothes are perceived as more intelligent, but as less interesting than teaching assistants who wear less formal clothes (Morris, Gorham, Cohen, & Huffman, 1996). When women dress in a masculine fashion during a recruitment interview, they are more likely to be hired (Forsythe, 1990), and when they dress sexily in prestigious jobs, they are perceived as less competent (Glick, Larsen, Johnson, & Branstiter, 2005). Clients are more likely to return to formally dressed therapists than to casually dressed therapists (Dacy & Brodsky, 1992).…”
Section: Isaac Bashevis Singermentioning
confidence: 93%
“…Teaching assistants who wear formal clothes are perceived as more intelligent, but as less interesting than teaching assistants who wear less formal clothes (Morris, Gorham, Cohen, & Huffman, 1996). When women dress in a masculine fashion during a recruitment interview, they are more likely to be hired (Forsythe, 1990), and when they dress sexily in prestigious jobs, they are perceived as less competent (Glick, Larsen, Johnson, & Branstiter, 2005). Clients are more likely to return to formally dressed therapists than to casually dressed therapists (Dacy & Brodsky, 1992).…”
Section: Isaac Bashevis Singermentioning
confidence: 93%
“…However, nonverbal cues 16 and photographs 17 (where factors such as applicant clothing 18 vary, influencing the perceived attractiveness of the applicant 19 ) can also account for a significant amount of variance. It seems reasonable to anticipate similar effects for applicant photographs found on social networking Web pages: candidates appearing in photographs of themselves in a drunken stupor are likely to be evaluated unfavorably.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…In particular, the consequences of particular dress 'styles' on e.g. hiring decisions (Forsythe 1990), communication (Joseph 1986), organizational decline (Whetten, forthcoming) and CEO turnover (Hambrick, forthcoming) have been documented. Needless to say, the results of this work have been eagerly incorporated into the vast array of popular guides on this subject, such as Dress for Success (Molloy 1975), Dress for Duress (Plys 1990) and Dressing for Recession (Lowengard 1992).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%