2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.engstruct.2016.06.026
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of arrangement of tensile reinforcement on flexural stiffness and cracking

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
33
0
3

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

4
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 60 publications
(37 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
1
33
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…It also relies on the geometry (length) of the tie. Considering the cracking behavior, experimental results obtained by the authors and other researchers (e.g., References , and ) indicated that the crack pattern is dependent on geometry of the specimen and arrangement of the reinforcement. By means of an extensive experimental program (54 ties of different geometry and loading layout were tested), a representative geometry of the samples that allows to assess the end effect is identified.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 92%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…It also relies on the geometry (length) of the tie. Considering the cracking behavior, experimental results obtained by the authors and other researchers (e.g., References , and ) indicated that the crack pattern is dependent on geometry of the specimen and arrangement of the reinforcement. By means of an extensive experimental program (54 ties of different geometry and loading layout were tested), a representative geometry of the samples that allows to assess the end effect is identified.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…Test results indicated that the cover correlates with the scatter of average deformations of the ties. An example of such effect is presented in Figure that shows the tensile load‐average strain diagrams of twin‐specimens with 60 × 60 mm and 100 × 100 mm cross sections.…”
Section: Tie Testsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Maximum crack spacing as a function of the effective reinforcement ratio—Tests results from Gribniak et al (Specimens S1‐2 and S2‐3) compared with theoretical predictions of Eurocode 2, Model Code 2010 and Debernardi and Taliano Model . The variation of effective reinforcement ratio is obtained playing on the number of steel bars…”
Section: Code Formulationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It should be noted that the typical tensile elements with a bar at the central position might not be representative for all cases due to the unrealistically simplified loading condition: the load is applied directly to the bar, rather than the uniformly to the whole cross-section. Moreover, such elements are incapable to reflect the deformation behavior associated with group effects of closely spaced reinforcement bars [8,24,25]. Hence, the modeling results would not be representative of the behavioral characteristics in the tension zone of real structural members, where multiple bars exist.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%