2011
DOI: 10.1644/10-mamm-a-112.1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of artificial night lighting on temporally partitioned spiny mice

Abstract: We studied the effect of ecological light pollution on a rocky desert community, focusing on 2 spiny mouse congeners, nocturnal Acomys cahirinus (common spiny mouse) and diurnal Acomys russatus (golden spiny mouse). We hypothesized that in response to artificial illumination A. cahirinus will decrease its activity and A. russatus will increase its activity, and thus temporal overlap and interspecific competition could increase. Our study took place in 4 field enclosures: the 1st and 3rd months were controls wi… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
56
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 82 publications
(57 citation statements)
references
References 49 publications
1
56
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Mammals provide an interesting study group, being globally distributed, occupying a broad range of environments, and exhibiting a wide diversity of time-partitioning behavior. Much concern has also been expressed as to the potential impacts of nighttime light pollution on the group, and there are many studies documenting significant influences (31,32). Due to the global nature of this study, and the paucity of detailed information on time partitioning reported for many species, our focus is on a high-level categorization, allocating species to one of four temporal niches: nocturnal, diurnal, cathemeral, and crepuscular ( Fig.…”
Section: Significancementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Mammals provide an interesting study group, being globally distributed, occupying a broad range of environments, and exhibiting a wide diversity of time-partitioning behavior. Much concern has also been expressed as to the potential impacts of nighttime light pollution on the group, and there are many studies documenting significant influences (31,32). Due to the global nature of this study, and the paucity of detailed information on time partitioning reported for many species, our focus is on a high-level categorization, allocating species to one of four temporal niches: nocturnal, diurnal, cathemeral, and crepuscular ( Fig.…”
Section: Significancementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Arguably, the principal effects, aside from those following from the associated carbon emissions, operate through the impacts on time partitioning by organisms (how they distribute activity through the day) and on their circadian rhythms and patterns of photoperiodism . Artificial nighttime lighting has been documented to change both the timing and the period over which organisms can capture resources, typically increasing the opportunities for diurnal species and reducing those for nocturnal ones (e.g., Garber 1978;Wolff 1982;Martin 1990;Negro et al 2000;Bird et al 2004;Perry and Fisher 2006;Frank 2009;Santos et al 2010;Rotics et al 2011). This alters species interactions (e.g., competition, predator-prey), and may in turn reshape community structure, and presumably associated ecosystem functions and processes, although the latter has yet to be demonstrated (Moore et al 2001(Moore et al , 2006Longcore and Rich 2004;Davies et al 2012).…”
Section: Ecosystemsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For instance, great tits (Parus major) provision their offspring at higher rates when exposed to experimental white ALAN directly at the nest box (Titulaer et al, 2012), and also show more activity at night in the lab (de Jong et al, 2016b), possibly incurring in energetic costs. In nocturnal species, such as mice and bats, ALAN is usually associated with avoidance behavior and lower activity levels at night (Stone et al, 2009;Rotics et al, 2011;Spoelstra et al, 2015). Timing of singing and sleep are also strongly affected by light pollution (Kempenaers et al, 2010;Da Silva et al, 2014;Raap et al, 2015), and such changes are suggested to have physiological consequences (Dominoni et al, 2016).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%