Effect of Astigmatism Treatment With Three Excimer Lasers After Photorefractive Keratectomy

Abstract

Objectives: To compare astigmatism correction after photorefractive keratectomy (PRK) using three excimer laser devices, Alcon Wavelight EX500, Schwind Amaris 1,050, and Technolas Teneo317 M2. Methods: This retrospective study included 414 eyes from 414 subjects with a history of PRK performed using Alcon Wavelight (n=172), Schwind Amaris (n=122), and Technolas (n=120). Uncorrected & corrected distance visual acuity (UDVA & CDVA), and refractive status (spherical equivalent (SE) and vector analysis (J0 and J45)) were postoperatively recorded at the 6-month and 12-month examinations. Results: The mean CDVA and J45 at 6-month and 12-month showed no statistically significant difference among the three different excimer lasers (P>0.05). There was a statistically significant difference in mean UDVA and J0 at 6-month and 12-month after PRK among the three groups, with no statistically significant difference between Alcon Wavelight and Schwind Amaris lasers, while both of the prior lasers showed a significant difference with the Technolas laser. The highest and lowest changes in the magnitude of J0 in 6-month and 12-month follow-ups were seen for the Alcon Wavelight and Technolas groups, respectively. Both Schwind Amaris and Technolas had a small hyperopic SE while the Alcon Wavelight's SE was minimally myopic. This difference in SE between Alcon Wavelight and both Schwind Amaris and Technolas reached statistical significance. Conclusion: While all three lasers performed well in reducing preoperative astigmatism; however, the Alcon Wavelight and Schwind Amaris were more effective in correcting astigmatism than the Technolas. The difference between the Alcon Wavelight and Schwind Amaris did not reach statistical significance.