1998
DOI: 10.1002/(sici)1096-987x(199802)19:3<363::aid-jcc9>3.0.co;2-r
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of available volumes on radial distribution functions

Abstract: The traditional method of analyzing solution structuring properties of solutes using atom–atom radial distribution functions (rdfs) can give rise to misleading interpretations when the volume occupied by the solute is ignored. It is shown by using the examples of O(4) in α‐ and β‐D‐allose that a more reliable interpretation of rdfs can be obtained by normalising the rdf using the available volume, rather than the traditional volume of a spherical shell. © 1998 John Wiley & Sons, Inc. J Comput Chem 19: 363–367,… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
21
0

Year Published

2001
2001
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 30 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
3
21
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The calculation of accessible volume around the peptide has been carried out by using a Monte Carlo random number insertion method. 72 The results corresponding to the repeat units R1− R7 as obtained by averaging over eight different peptide monomer conformations (S1−S8) are depicted in Figure 7a.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The calculation of accessible volume around the peptide has been carried out by using a Monte Carlo random number insertion method. 72 The results corresponding to the repeat units R1− R7 as obtained by averaging over eight different peptide monomer conformations (S1−S8) are depicted in Figure 7a.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this calculation, we have considered the actual volume accessible to water within a spherical shell of radius r and thickness δr around the peptide residues, instead of the entire volume of the shell to normalize the g ( r ) values. The calculation of accessible volume around the peptide has been carried out by using a Monte Carlo random number insertion method . The results corresponding to the repeat units R1–R7 as obtained by averaging over eight different peptide monomer conformations (S1–S8) are depicted in Figure a.…”
Section: Results and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, the s ( r ) values are normalized by using the actual volume available to water within a shell at a distance r with thickness δr instead of by the entire volume of the corresponding spherical shell, as usually done in standard radial distribution function (rdf) calculations. We have employed the method proposed by Astley et al to calculate the available volume of water around the peptide surfaces. s ( r ) may be regarded as the surface distribution function of waters, as the employed minimum distance criteria measures the distance of waters from microscopically ragged peptide surfaces.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The reasoning behind this is that not all of the volume around a ligand atom j is actually available to a protein atom i , as protein atoms cannot occupy space already taken by ligand atoms. The effect of excluded volume on RDFs has previously been recognized in a molecular dynamics study of monosaccharides in water 28. For the calculation of the expected number of contacts in statistical potentials, one should only use the available volume, instead of the full volume of a spherical shell.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%