2018
DOI: 10.1088/1757-899x/316/1/012073
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of biofilm and selective mixed culture on microbial fuel cell for the treatment of tempeh industrial wastewater

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, as the reactor age increases, there was no observable COD difference between FAB-MFC and MFC but voltage generation maximized in FAB-MFC, which entails suspended biofilms (not on the anode) might slowly developing in the non-FAB reactor to remove the COD. In MFC, the optimal period for biofilm growth was seven days (Arbianti et al 2018), whereas FAB (MEJdish) might facilitate the attachment and biofilm formation that shorten this period. Therefore, to enhance the COD removal, the FAB could be advisable; but the voltage generation was another critical concern.…”
Section: Performance Of the Fab-mfc Optimization Setup Cod Removal Efficiencymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…However, as the reactor age increases, there was no observable COD difference between FAB-MFC and MFC but voltage generation maximized in FAB-MFC, which entails suspended biofilms (not on the anode) might slowly developing in the non-FAB reactor to remove the COD. In MFC, the optimal period for biofilm growth was seven days (Arbianti et al 2018), whereas FAB (MEJdish) might facilitate the attachment and biofilm formation that shorten this period. Therefore, to enhance the COD removal, the FAB could be advisable; but the voltage generation was another critical concern.…”
Section: Performance Of the Fab-mfc Optimization Setup Cod Removal Efficiencymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Another major drawback of MFC is the diffusion of oxygen from cathode to anode that hampers the energy yield, especially in membrane-less MFC (ML-MFC) (Jang et al 2004). The optimum biofilm formation time on the anode electrode surface is seven days (Arbianti et al 2018). The anode biofilm forms two layers; the inner layer generates electricity, whereas the outer layer consumes oxygen.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The major drawback of membraneless MFC (ML-MFC) is the diffusion of oxygen from cathode to anode that hampers the energy yield (Jang et al 2004). The optimum biofilm formation time is 7 days (Arbianti et al 2018). The formation and growth of anode biofilms in MFC are highly sensitive to oxygen (Yang et al 2019).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…When it comes to actual application, the usage of MFCs with mixed anode consortia is more profitable than pure culture of exoelectrogens. It has been proven that the electricity generation capacity and the ability to adapt to the complex substrates are lower for MFC systems, operated with pure cultures of exoelectrogens than for the systems, operated with mixed consortia [12,13]. Thus, in order to create the biofilm, enriched with different types of microorganisms, natural sources of exoelectrogens are preferred.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There is a certain number of techniques for formation of biofilm with exoelectrogenic activity. They are based on supporting of conditions that can promote the development of exoelectrogens and suppress other bacteria [13][14][15][16][17].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%