Abstract:Bleaching treatment conducted with two home bleaching agents (Opalescence 10%, Ultradent, and Hi-Lite II, Shofu) had no adverse effects on enamel microhardness or on surface morphology. Bleaching with 3% hydrogen peroxide can have a negative effect on enamel hardness and surface morphology when performed as described in this study.
“…This is in agreement with several previous reports [29,30,31,32,33,34,35,36,37,38,39,40,41,42,43,44]. In contrast, a few studies have reported changes in the mechanical properties of enamel [45,46,47].…”
“…This is in agreement with several previous reports [29,30,31,32,33,34,35,36,37,38,39,40,41,42,43,44]. In contrast, a few studies have reported changes in the mechanical properties of enamel [45,46,47].…”
“…7,9,13,[19][20] However, other studies reported that 10% carbamide peroxide gel did not affect enamel surface hardness. [21][22][23] These contradictory findings among different studies might be due to differences in method, such as frequency and time of bleaching treatment, storage media or the use of human or bovine teeth.…”
Effect of Different Fluoridation Regimes on the Microhardness of Bleached Enamel Clinical RelevanceFluoridation is effective in preventing microhardness loss due to bleaching, but additional fluoride gel supplementation is not superior to toothpaste fluoridation alone.
“…9,27,28 However, other studies have reported different results with no statistically significant differences in tooth hard tissue characteristics, including enamel and dentin surface roughness, after bleaching with 10% and 15% carbamide peroxide. 17,18,[29][30][31] The discrepancies in the results of various studies might be attributed to differences in the formulation and concentration of bleaching agents; the duration of daily applications or treatment protocols; differences in study designs, including the environments in which the specimens are stored (eg, artificial or human saliva); the use of remineralizing agents; continuous use of fluoridated toothpastes; and the technique of toothbrushing during the procedure and after bleaching. 2,14,30,32,33 In the present study, tooth structures underwent surface changes after bleaching, and toothbrushing immediately after bleaching had a substantial role in increasing enamel surface roughness.…”
SUMMARY
This study aimed to evaluate the effect of toothbrushing on enamel surface roughness at three different intervals after daily bleaching treatment. Eighty enamel slabs were initially evaluated for surface roughness and then randomly divided into four groups. The bleaching procedure was carried out for 21 days, six hours daily. In the control group (group 1), the specimens were not brushed after bleaching, but in groups 2–4, they were brushed with toothpaste immediately, one hour, or two hours after bleaching, respectively. Then the specimens were stored in artificial saliva. Enamel surface roughness was reevaluated at the end of the period. Kruskal-Wallis and Mann-Whitney U tests showed statistically significant differences in the means of surface roughness values between the immediately brushed group and the three other groups (p<0.001). Daily toothbrushing immediately after bleaching increased enamel surface roughness; however, postponing the procedure for one or two hours after daily bleaching and exposing the specimens to artificial saliva during the study period resulted in enamel surface roughness comparable to that of the control group.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.