2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.neulet.2010.12.034
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of body position on bilateral EEG alterations and their relationship with autonomic nervous modulation in normal subjects

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

5
16
1

Year Published

2013
2013
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
5
16
1
Order By: Relevance
“…These collective findings propose posture as a modulator of neural activity. Although a few studies have found changes in EEG as a function of posture (Chang et al, 2011;Cole, 1989;Rice et al, 2013), these efforts shied away from directly testing and addressing how posture may influence brain activity in canonical imaging contexts such as those common to fMRI and EEG.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These collective findings propose posture as a modulator of neural activity. Although a few studies have found changes in EEG as a function of posture (Chang et al, 2011;Cole, 1989;Rice et al, 2013), these efforts shied away from directly testing and addressing how posture may influence brain activity in canonical imaging contexts such as those common to fMRI and EEG.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[9]- [11]) and EEG activities [9]. Specifically, EEG power spectra in high frequency (12 − 40 Hz) was significantly increased in the right hemisphere [12] when passing from supine to upright. Cole [9] confirmed the hypothesis that the fall in baroreceptor firing produced by the upright posture contributes to EEG arousal in subjects who showed a normal baroreflex response to tilt.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It has been shown that increases in heart rate variability are observed simultaneously with decreases in α power and are indicative of enhancements of activation (Yu X. et al, 2009, Chang et al, 2011.…”
Section: Psychodiagnostic Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%