1989
DOI: 10.1016/0143-7496(89)90135-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of bond thickness on fracture and fatigue strength of adhesively bonded composite joints

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

1
27
1

Year Published

2009
2009
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(29 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
1
27
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The effect of bondline thickness (t), on adhesive joint performance has been the subject of considerable research, with many studies showing quite significant differences in resistance to failure as a function of the adhesive bondline thickness [1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13]. It has been observed, as shown schematically in Fig.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 86%
“…The effect of bondline thickness (t), on adhesive joint performance has been the subject of considerable research, with many studies showing quite significant differences in resistance to failure as a function of the adhesive bondline thickness [1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13]. It has been observed, as shown schematically in Fig.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 86%
“…The failure was observed to change from adhesion failure to cohesive failure for adhesive layer thickness greater than 0.075 mm in [12] whereas the failure was cohesive in nature in the studies [13][14][15][16]. These studies indicate that the CZM parameters or the TSL itself could depend on the adhesive layer thickness for a given system.…”
mentioning
confidence: 47%
“…Investigations on the effect of adhesive layer thickness on the fracture behavior of adhesive joints have indicated a strong dependence of the fracture energy on adhesive thickness [12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19]. The failure was observed to change from adhesion failure to cohesive failure for adhesive layer thickness greater than 0.075 mm in [12] whereas the failure was cohesive in nature in the studies [13][14][15][16].…”
mentioning
confidence: 80%
“…This effect is explained as results of increases in the stress distribution near the crack tip at lower adhesive thickness and, consequently, an increase in the FCGR. However, there exists a limit thickness, for which no changes in the FCG can be perceived (Mall & Ramamurthy, 1989). …”
Section: Effect Of Bonding Thicknessmentioning
confidence: 97%