2017
DOI: 10.1007/s11012-017-0790-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of bottom topography on wave scattering by multiple porous barriers

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

2
7
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
2
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Regarding the porosity representation, most potentialflow models apply the porous pressure-drop in a linearised way and only few models use a non-linear formulation. Examples for work that use a linear relationship between pressure-drop and flow velocity are studies on a nearly vertical porous wall, done by Chakrabarti and Sahoo (1996), or for investigations on the effects of bottom topography, done by Kaligatla and Sahoo (2017) and Kaligatla et al (2018). A quadratic pressure-drop formulation has for instance been used by Mei et al (1974) in combination with shallow water theory, by Bennett et al (1992) for thin vertical barriers and by Liu and Li (2017) for an iterative boundary element model.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Regarding the porosity representation, most potentialflow models apply the porous pressure-drop in a linearised way and only few models use a non-linear formulation. Examples for work that use a linear relationship between pressure-drop and flow velocity are studies on a nearly vertical porous wall, done by Chakrabarti and Sahoo (1996), or for investigations on the effects of bottom topography, done by Kaligatla and Sahoo (2017) and Kaligatla et al (2018). A quadratic pressure-drop formulation has for instance been used by Mei et al (1974) in combination with shallow water theory, by Bennett et al (1992) for thin vertical barriers and by Liu and Li (2017) for an iterative boundary element model.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The study suggested that the bottom standing barriers are acceptable as breakwaters, and free clamped barriers performance is significant as compared with moored clamped barriers to attenuate the maximum wave energy. Behera and Ng (2018), Kaligatla et al (2018) extended the study considering variation in the seabed characteristics in the wave reflected region. Very recently, Somervell et al (2018) proposed a simplified empirical relation to find the friction factor with known parameters like porosity, width and depth of the structure using the eigenfunction expansion method.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Scattered water waves under the combined effects of permeable barriers and undulation bottoms were investigated. Following Kaligatla, et al [47], the wave period of the incident wave was arranged as 8sec T = , and the permeable parameter was set to…”
Section: Water Scattering By Fully Submerged Barriers Behind An Undul...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, the horizontal length of the undulated bottom was denoted as v . In the application of EMM, the number of shelves was set to 100 M = , and no evanescent mode was considered, similar to Kaligatla, et al [47]. Sequentially, the issue of scattered water waves by J half-cosine breakwaters was considered.…”
Section: Water Scattering By Fully Submerged Barriers Behind An Undul...mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation