2022
DOI: 10.1002/eqe.3730
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of boundary condition on the cyclic response of I‐shaped steel columns: Two‐story subassemblage versus isolated column tests

Abstract: Recent studies on isolated steel columns under combined axial load and cyclic lateral drift showed that the column response is affected by the boundary condition. To consider more realistic boundary conditions of first‐story columns in a frame, two‐and‐a‐half story beam‐column subassemblages were tested to investigate their behavior under reversed cyclic loading. The subassemblages, composed of a steel column with steel beams at two floor levels, used highly ductile I‐shaped sections with web slenderness of ei… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

3
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The seismic performance of a column can also be influenced by its boundary conditions. 20 For instance, different stiffnesses of the beams and columns connected to this column result in different rotational stiffnesses of the beam-to-column joints. The values of i Bj and i Cj also change when beams or columns have initial cracks or damage, and this change affects the performance of neighbouring components and is reflected in the value of CC.…”
Section: Expressions Of the Modified CCmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The seismic performance of a column can also be influenced by its boundary conditions. 20 For instance, different stiffnesses of the beams and columns connected to this column result in different rotational stiffnesses of the beam-to-column joints. The values of i Bj and i Cj also change when beams or columns have initial cracks or damage, and this change affects the performance of neighbouring components and is reflected in the value of CC.…”
Section: Expressions Of the Modified CCmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…y 0, j is the relative height of the inflection point of the column on the j th storey. The seismic performance of a column can also be influenced by its boundary conditions 20 . For instance, different stiffnesses of the beams and columns connected to this column result in different rotational stiffnesses of the beam‐to‐column joints.…”
Section: Conceptmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, in full-scale tests of steel building columns to collapse it has been seen that the seismic performance of steel columns is affected by the boundary conditions of the frame because of the flexibility of the beam-to-column connections intersecting the column. [2][3][4][5] Moreover, the internal force redistribution caused by the earlier yielding and local buckling evolution of beams due to the strong-column/weak-beam concept, further affects the boundary conditions at column ends. Such effects gradually become more severe at high inelastic levels of the structural response (near collapse) and can significantly alter loads and boundary conditions in columns.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, the location of the inflection point is constant throughout the loading. However, in full‐scale tests of steel building columns to collapse it has been seen that the seismic performance of steel columns is affected by the boundary conditions of the frame because of the flexibility of the beam‐to‐column connections intersecting the column 2–5 . Moreover, the internal force redistribution caused by the earlier yielding and local buckling evolution of beams due to the strong‐column/weak‐beam concept, further affects the boundary conditions at column ends.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The subassemblage is part of a seven‐story steel dual system including a special moment frame (SMF) in one bay and a buckling‐restrained braced frame (BRBF) in the other bay designed and evaluated as part of a previous study 9 . Considering that the seismic performance of steel first‐story columns are highly sensitive to the boundary condition at both ends, 10 13 the subassemblage specimen is extended to the mid height of the second story with an assumed inflection point at the top end. In addition, two steel beams at the second floor extend their respective mid‐spans to an assumed inflection point.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%