2007
DOI: 10.1097/01.tp.0000259935.82722.11
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of Brain-Dead Donor Resuscitation on Delayed Graft Function: Results of a Monocentric Analysis

Abstract: Our study shows an impact for only a limited number of brain dead donor resuscitation parameters on DGF duration. We also show that CIT has a much lower threshold (<16 hr) for DGF risk than previously described. Importantly, we show that recipient age is clearly a major independent risk factor for prolonged DGF, whereas donor age seems to act mostly as a dependent risk factor.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

3
37
0
2

Year Published

2007
2007
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 58 publications
(42 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
3
37
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Although a number of previous reports have tried to assess the impact of donor management on recipient kidney graft function (11,(14)(15)(16)(17)(18)(19)(20)(21)(22)(23)(24), none of these studies have attempted to standardize donor management on a regional level or evaluate the impact of the prospective implementation of a DMG checklist on DGF. In the current investigation, the impact of meeting such a checklist of DMGs on graft outcomes in deceased donor kidney recipients was prospectively investigated.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although a number of previous reports have tried to assess the impact of donor management on recipient kidney graft function (11,(14)(15)(16)(17)(18)(19)(20)(21)(22)(23)(24), none of these studies have attempted to standardize donor management on a regional level or evaluate the impact of the prospective implementation of a DMG checklist on DGF. In the current investigation, the impact of meeting such a checklist of DMGs on graft outcomes in deceased donor kidney recipients was prospectively investigated.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One subsequent meta-analysis suggested a trend towards increased mortality after HES in comparison with alternative resuscitation fluids in trials that included patients with severe sepsis and septic shock, in high-quality and multicentre trials [30]. [68] Cohort study Plasmapheresis Plasma chitotriosidase activity (marker for lysosomal storage) Avorn [46] Case-control study Coronary artery bypass surgery Effect of 6% HES 450/0.7 on postoperative bleeding Bayer [92] Before-and-after cohort study Severe sepsis Effect of predominantly HES 130/0.4, 4% gelatin and only crystalloids on renal function Boussekey [71] Cohort Predefined subgroup analysis Severe sepsis Effect of 4% albumin versus 0.9% saline on 28-day mortality Ginz [69] Case report ICU patient Autopsy Giral [55] Cohort study Brain-dead organ donors Kidney graft function after HES Gondos [93] Multicentre Safety: Medium and high molecular weight HES preparations in cumulative doses below 20 mL/kg were associated with increased postoperative bleeding in cardiac surgical patients compared with albumin [pooled standardized mean difference, 0.24 (95% CI -0.40, -0.08)] [44]. Two cohort studies found increased bleeding or chest tube drainage after use of HES in cardiac surgery [45,46].…”
Section: Synthetic Colloidsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Graft function: In 1996, one RCT found that more kidney transplant recipients required RRT in the first 8 days if they had received organs from donors after resuscitation with 6% HES 200/0.6 than if donors had been resuscitated with only 3% gelatin [27 (33%) versus 20 (5%), p = 0.029] [53]. Subsequent non-randomized cohort studies confirmed that HES was a risk factor for delayed graft function in these patients [54,55] or found no difference in comparison with fluid therapy with only crystalloids or other colloids [56,57]. A recent RCT which compared 4% gelatin or HES 130/0.4 for resuscitation of 77 living donors found no difference in urine output within 4 days after surgery [58].…”
Section: Synthetic Colloidsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Maintenance dialysis vintage prior to transplant was found to be perhaps the most important contributor [27], followed by obesity and diabetes [28,29]. Male patients, older than 55 years, of African-American race, with prolonged waiting-time period, sensitized and those who received small-for-size organs all have increased risk for DGF [3,4,[30][31][32].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%