2023
DOI: 10.1136/jim-2020-001747
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of bromhexine in hospitalized patients with COVID-19

Abstract: BackgroundBromhexine is a potent inhibitor of transmembrane serine protease 2 and appears to have an antiviral effect in controlling influenza and parainfluenza infection; however, its efficacy in COVID-19 is controversial.MethodsA group of hospitalized patients with confirmed COVID-19 pneumonia were randomized using 1:1 allocation to either standard treatment lopinavir/ritonavir and interferon beta-1a or bromhexine 8 mg four times a day in addition to standard therapy. The primary outcome was clinical improve… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
17
0
2

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
1
17
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Overall, 115 studies with 77,128 patients reported the number of patients requiring mechanical ventilation during the study period. We included ACEIs/ARBs, ammonium chloride, azithromycin, bamlanivimab, baricitinib plus remdesivir, bromhexine, budesonide, camostat mesilate, canakinumab, chloroquine, colchicine, convalescent plasma, dexamethasone, doxycycline, favipiravir, hydroxychloroquine, hydroxychloroquine plus azithromycin, hydroxychloroquine plus favipiravir, imatinib, INM005, interferon beta, intravenous immunoglobulin, ivermectin, lopinavir/ritonavir, methylprednisolone, recombinant human GCSF, remdesivir, sarilumab, sofosbuvir plus daclatasvir, sulodexide, tocilizumab, tofacitinib, vitamin D3 and SOC as treatment nodes in the NMA, for which observations came from 84 studies ( 3 , 6 , 22 26 , 28 31 , 35 , 42 , 43 , 46 , 47 , 50 , 53 , 55 , 57 61 , 63 , 64 , 66 , 67 , 71 , 73 77 , 79 , 80 , 82 , 83 , 85 87 , 89 , 92 94 , 96 100 , 102 , 105 107 , 109 , 111 118 , 120 124 , 126 , 128 132 , 134 , 135 , 139 , 140 , 145 , 151 , 152 , 154 156 ). About one-third (26/84) of the included studies were evaluated as low risk ( Supplementary Table 6 ).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Overall, 115 studies with 77,128 patients reported the number of patients requiring mechanical ventilation during the study period. We included ACEIs/ARBs, ammonium chloride, azithromycin, bamlanivimab, baricitinib plus remdesivir, bromhexine, budesonide, camostat mesilate, canakinumab, chloroquine, colchicine, convalescent plasma, dexamethasone, doxycycline, favipiravir, hydroxychloroquine, hydroxychloroquine plus azithromycin, hydroxychloroquine plus favipiravir, imatinib, INM005, interferon beta, intravenous immunoglobulin, ivermectin, lopinavir/ritonavir, methylprednisolone, recombinant human GCSF, remdesivir, sarilumab, sofosbuvir plus daclatasvir, sulodexide, tocilizumab, tofacitinib, vitamin D3 and SOC as treatment nodes in the NMA, for which observations came from 84 studies ( 3 , 6 , 22 26 , 28 31 , 35 , 42 , 43 , 46 , 47 , 50 , 53 , 55 , 57 61 , 63 , 64 , 66 , 67 , 71 , 73 77 , 79 , 80 , 82 , 83 , 85 87 , 89 , 92 94 , 96 100 , 102 , 105 107 , 109 , 111 118 , 120 124 , 126 , 128 132 , 134 , 135 , 139 , 140 , 145 , 151 , 152 , 154 156 ). About one-third (26/84) of the included studies were evaluated as low risk ( Supplementary Table 6 ).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In one trial, SOC treatment (n = 39) was compared with additional treatment with 24 mg of BHH per day for 14 days (n = 39) in patients with COVID-19 symptoms, and a significant decrease in the rate of ICU admission and need for ventilation in the BHH arm was reported [190]. However, in a later study, administration of 32 mg BHH per day for 14 days in 48 hospitalized COVID-19 patients failed to accelerate clinical improvement [191]. Li et al reported a non-significant trend towards improved clinical recovery in a BHH treatment cohort (n = 12) upon administration of the maximum recommended dose of 96 mg per day for 14 days [192].…”
Section: Clinical Evaluation Of Tmprss2 Inhibitors In Covid-19 Patientsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Second, SOC therapy at the study site was different depending on local and/or temporal differences, which could affect the rate of clinical improvement. Third, the definitions and assessment of the primary clinical outcomes were not uniform, variously observing a decline in the clinical score, rate of ICU admission and mortality, or reduction in clinical symptoms [190][191][192]. Overall, larger clinical trials will be required to clarify the impact of BHH on COVID-19 [192].…”
Section: Clinical Evaluation Of Tmprss2 Inhibitors In Covid-19 Patientsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A non-significant trend toward better clinical recovery upon administration of BHH was reported by Li et al [ 112 ]. BHH failed to accelerate the clinical improvement of COVID-19 patients in the Tolouian et al study [ 113 ]. Contradictory outcomes of the experiments may come as a result of various study designs and further clinical trials are required to formulate the applicability of BHH in COVID-19.…”
Section: Cell Membrane and Golgi Apparatusmentioning
confidence: 99%