2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2020.11.039
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of build angle and layer height on the accuracy of 3-dimensional printed dental models

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
29
1

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 43 publications
(36 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
2
29
1
Order By: Relevance
“…A recent interesting research focus is the position of the object on the building plate in the stereolithographic printer. Authors have recommended an optimal printing direction to achieve maximal dimensional accuracy (189,190,199). The selection of a build direction will affect the slicing of the object used by the printer in the printing process resulting in a "z-stepping" effect on the surface of the surgical guide.…”
Section: Surgical Guide Productionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A recent interesting research focus is the position of the object on the building plate in the stereolithographic printer. Authors have recommended an optimal printing direction to achieve maximal dimensional accuracy (189,190,199). The selection of a build direction will affect the slicing of the object used by the printer in the printing process resulting in a "z-stepping" effect on the surface of the surgical guide.…”
Section: Surgical Guide Productionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…44 Variables like layer thickness and build orientation of the object must be decided. Dimensional accuracy of AM devices has been found to be negatively affected by aspects of the manufacturing process, such as build orientation, [45][46][47][48][49][50] number of objects being printed, 51 and the post-processing method. 50,52,53 Once the design and printing parameters have been finalized, the device (or surgical implant guide) will then be printed by the printer selected.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As a result, the 3D-printed CAs were designed at a build angle of 30° and printed using a DLP 3D printer with a 50 µm resolution, based on previous studies. 36,37 Third, a 50 µm offset was applied to the inner surface of the 3D-printed CAs to compensate for the thickness change and to enhance the adaptability. 36 A previous study examining the t of a printed splint showed that splints with 0.05, 0.1, and 0.2 mm offsets can t the teeth better than those without offset.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%