2020
DOI: 10.5458/jag.jag.jag-2020_0003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of C-6 Methylol Groups on Substrate Recognition of Glucose/Xylose Mixed Oligosaccharides by Cellobiose Dehydrogenase from the Basidiomycete <i>Phanerochaete chrysosporium</i>

Abstract: Cellobiose dehydrogenase (CDH) is a flavocytochrome catalyzing oxidation of the reducing end of cellobiose and cellooligosaccharides, and has a key role in the degradation of cellulosic biomass by filamentous fungi. Here, we use a lineup of glucose/xylose-mixed β-1,4-linked disaccharides and trisaccharides, enzymatically synthesized by means of the reverse reaction of cellobiose phosphorylase and cellodextrin phosphorylase, to investigate the substrate recognition of CDH. We found that CDH utilizes β-D-xylopyr… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
1
1

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…AA3_1 enzymes clearly vary in their ability to oxidize xylooligosaccharides. For instance, the Pc CDH from Basidiomycota was found to primarily accept cellobiose, but could not oxidize xylobiose, xylotriose, or Glc-Glc-Xyl, Xyl-Glc-Xyl, and Glc-Xyl-Xyl [ 34 ], while xylobiose was oxidized by Nc CDHs and Hi CDHs from Ascomycota, the catalytic efficiency was 50 to 2500 times lower than that towards cellobiose [ 10 , 11 ]. By contrast, the affinity and the catalytic efficiency for Tm XdhA towards xylobiose, xylotriose and xylotetraose was more than ten times higher compared to all previous characterized CDHs [ 12 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…AA3_1 enzymes clearly vary in their ability to oxidize xylooligosaccharides. For instance, the Pc CDH from Basidiomycota was found to primarily accept cellobiose, but could not oxidize xylobiose, xylotriose, or Glc-Glc-Xyl, Xyl-Glc-Xyl, and Glc-Xyl-Xyl [ 34 ], while xylobiose was oxidized by Nc CDHs and Hi CDHs from Ascomycota, the catalytic efficiency was 50 to 2500 times lower than that towards cellobiose [ 10 , 11 ]. By contrast, the affinity and the catalytic efficiency for Tm XdhA towards xylobiose, xylotriose and xylotetraose was more than ten times higher compared to all previous characterized CDHs [ 12 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…AA3_1 enzymes clearly vary in their ability to oxidize xylooligosaccharides. For instance, the PcCDH from Basidomycota was found to primarily accept cellobiose but could not oxidize xylobiose, xylotriose, or Glc-Glc-Xyl, Xyl-Glc-Xyl, and Glc-Xyl-Xyl [34], while xylobiose was oxidized by NcCDHs and HiCDHs from Ascomycota, the catalytic e ciency was 50 to 2500 times lower than that towards cellobiose [10,11]. By constrast, the a nity and the catalytic e ciency for TmXdhA towards xylobiose, xylotriose and xylotetraose was more than ten-times higher compared to all previous characterized CDHs [12].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%