Effect of cardiovascular function to resistance exercise training with blood flow restriction

Yan, Zhijie; Aicui, L.; Andong, C.; Beibei, L.

doi:10.1016/j.rehab.2018.05.640

Cited by 2 publications

(2 citation statements)

References 0 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“… Nascimento et al (2019) suggested greater understanding of blood flow restriction’s effect on coagulation would be beneficial for those at an increased risk of thrombi development including individuals with obesity, hypertension, and diabetes. Blood flow restriction has; however, shown positive hemodynamic effects ( Loenneke et al, 2011 ; Neto et al, 2017 ; Yan et al, 2018 ; Nascimento et al, 2019 ) including among those with hypertension ( Barili et al, 2018 ).…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Current Trends in Blood Flow Restriction

et al. 2022

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Purpose: The purpose of the study was to explore how individuals in the United States of America applied BFR/KAATSU devices and administered BFR/KAATSU training. In addition, the study sought to examine safety topics related to BFR/KAATSU training.Methods: The study was completed using survey research. Subjects were recruited through Facebook, email, and word of mouth. The survey was developed, piloted, and finally deployed March 22, 2021-April 21, 2021.Results: In total, 148 consented to the research; 108 completed the survey, and of those 108, 70 indicated current use with BFR/KAATSU equipment. Professions represented included athletic training, personal training, physical therapy, and strength and conditioning. Among those currently using BFR/KAATSU training (n = 70), the following results were found. The most common devices used were inflatable devices (n = 43, 61.4%). Education completed prior to device administration was formal (n = 39, 55.7%) and/or self-directed (n = 37, 52.9%). Barriers were faced by 29 (41.4%) when trying to enact training. Techniques and parameters varied during application. Screening processes were used (n = 50, 71.4%) prior to training. The devices were used to determine restrictive pressure (n = 31, 44.3%), and a supine position was used most when determining initial restrictive pressure (n = 33, 47.1%). For subsequent restrictive pressure measurements, respondents repeated the same method used initially (n = 38, 54.3%). Workload was often defined as the length of time under tension/load (n = 22, 31.4%) and exercise was directly supervised (n = 52, 74.3%). Adverse effects included bruising, lightheadedness, and cramping (n = 15, 21.4%). The devices have also been applied on those with pathology (n = 16, 22.9%).Conclusion: Those using blood flow restriction/KAATSU devices came from several professions and used an assortment of devices for BFR/KAATSU training. Individuals applied devices using a variety of parameters on populations for which efficacy has and has not been well defined.

show abstract

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Current Trends in Blood Flow Restriction

et al. 2022

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…BFRT research has predominantly focused on the musculoskeletal response, intramuscular adaptations, and anaerobic performance; however, there have been few studies investigating BFRT’s effect on the cardiovascular system, pulmonary system, and overall performance measures in the active population, with some conflicting evidence supporting or refuting its utility [ 8 , 11 , 12 , 13 ]. Some of these studies have used BFR during resistance exercise (BFR-RT) [ 11 , 14 , 15 , 16 ] and others with BFR during aerobic exercise (BFR-AT) [ 17 , 18 ]. Use of BFRT during low-load-resistance exercise or low intensity cardiovascular exercise could potentially allow athletes an avenue to improve their fitness while recovering from injury.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Blood Flow Restriction during Walking Does Not Impact Body Composition or Performance Measures in Highly Trained Runners

Herda,

Cleary,

Young

et al. 2024

JFMK

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Blood flow restriction (BFR) is a commonly used training modality that has been demonstrated to enhance muscle characteristics such as size and function. The purpose of this study was to determine if a 4-week walking program with or without BFR in healthy, active adults has an effect on body composition, anaerobic, and aerobic running performance. Thirty-three participants, randomized among three groups, completed the walking program, which included five sets of 2 min walking intervals with 1 min rest, with or without BFR, or 10 min walking with BFR. Assessments completed before and after the walking program included body composition, 40-yard sprints, and a VO2MAX test on a treadmill. A two-way ANOVA revealed no changes among the groups nor for any variables at any time (p > 0.05). Additionally, one main effect for time indicated the VO2 at V-slope threshold was greater following training for all groups combined (p = 0.001). The results demonstrate that low volume and intensity walking with BFR for 4 weeks did not provide a sufficient stimulus for changing body composition or performance metrics in a group of very active adults. Longer or more isolated exposure of BFR on the limbs may contribute to more pronounced adaptations.

show abstract

Effect of cardiovascular function to resistance exercise training with blood flow restriction

Cited by 2 publications

References 0 publications

Current Trends in Blood Flow Restriction

Current Trends in Blood Flow Restriction

Blood Flow Restriction during Walking Does Not Impact Body Composition or Performance Measures in Highly Trained Runners

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About