Thermal activated carrier transfer between InAs quantum dots in very low density samples Abstract. In this work we develop a detailed experimental study of the exciton recombination dynamics as a function of temperature on QD-ensembles and single QDs in two low density samples having 16.5 and 25 dots/ m 2 . We corroborate at the single QD level the limitation of the exciton recombination time in the smallest QDs of the distribution by thermionic emission (electron emission in transient conditions). A portion of these emitted carriers is retrapped again in other (larger) QDs, but not very distant from those emitting the carriers, because the process is limited by the diffusion length at the considered temperature. E-mail: Juan.Mtnez.Pastor@uv.es
IntroductionIn the last years it was made great efforts to study self assembled InAs Quantum Dots (QDs) by microPhotoluminescence (μPL) [1]. It is of particular interest the study of single QDs in low density samples, because of their potential use in single photon and entangled photon sources for quantum information processing [2][3]. The limitation of the use of QDs in such applications comes from the temperature effect on carrier-phonon interaction and electron-hole recombination. During the last decade, a great effort has been made studying the temperature evolution of QD emission, obtaining good agreements between experimental data and kinetic exciton recombination models [4]. Thermal escape through the wetting layer (WL) or by phonon assisted tunneling is usually claimed as the most suitable mechanism to describe carrier transfer between QDs both in monomodal and bimodal distributions [5][6][7].In the present study we have analyzed this phenomenon in two different samples containing very low density of InAs/GaAs QDs. This is important because we can separate the μPL spectra from different QDs within the illumination area and hence compare more directly microscopic and ensemble exciton recombination dynamics. A detailed experimental study as a function of temperature has been carried out by using ensemble photoluminescence (PL), μPL, time resolved PL (TRPL) and μTRPL techniques. In both samples coexist two QD size distributions: (i) a small size one emitting in the region 1.25-1.35 eV (SQD family) and (ii) a large size one emitting in the region 1.05-1.20 eV (LQD family), as shown in Fig. 1. For these samples we observe a common phenomenology interpreted as follows: QDs belonging to the SQD family have electron confined states close to the WL ones and emit carriers towards such extended states, where they can diffuse and recaptured by other QDs not very far in space (within the diffusion length at the InAs WL at the lattice temperature) with smaller confinement (emitting and lower energies). These QDs emit at the low energy tail of the SQD PL band in the case of the sample with the lowest QD density and at the LQD PL band in the