2020
DOI: 10.1007/s11282-020-00448-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of CBCT dose reduction on the mandibular canal visibility: ex vivo comparative study

Abstract: Objectives To compare the difference in mandibular canal (MC) visibility using three different cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) acquisition protocols: high resolution (HR), standard resolution (ST) and Quick scan+ (QS+). Methods Twenty-five human dry mandibles were scanned by one CBCT machine; i-CAT FLX (Imaging Sciences International, Hatfield, PA, USA), using three different acquisition protocols: high-resolution (HR), standard (ST) and Quick scan+ (QS+). DICOM data were transferred to a third party soft… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Lahoud et al 21 observed that the algorithm performed better in CBCTs with a higher cortication degree 21 . Since the visibility of the MC may change according to the resolution of the CBCT acquisition protocol 30 , in the present study, different CBCT machines and resolution protocols were used. Different resolution protocols increased the generalizability of the presently validated tool, achieving a global accuracy of 0.997 for both MC with and without AL.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Lahoud et al 21 observed that the algorithm performed better in CBCTs with a higher cortication degree 21 . Since the visibility of the MC may change according to the resolution of the CBCT acquisition protocol 30 , in the present study, different CBCT machines and resolution protocols were used. Different resolution protocols increased the generalizability of the presently validated tool, achieving a global accuracy of 0.997 for both MC with and without AL.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is of particular importance for the evaluation of internal structures such as root canals [8][9][10]. In fact, CBCT can be useful to a variety of analysis that demand accuracy for the visualization of facial structures [11,12]. Therefore, these two techniques are useful to assess external and internal root anatomical variations.…”
Section: International Journal Of Advanced Engineering Research and Science (Ijaers)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Likewise, the substantial to almost perfect intra-and interobserver agreement for all observers further confirms the reliability of identifying these landmarks. Comparative literature is limited; however, two non-clinical studies on CBCT imaging of the mandibular canal can be noted: Neves et al [28] showed that the region providing best visibility of the canal was the dentulous mandibular region of third molars, and Zaki et al [47], that the tube current necessary for adequate visibility of the canal was higher than otherwise needed in low-dose protocols. Both studies advocated the potential of using dose protocols tailored to the purpose of the investigation, since Zaki et al [47], opined that some reduction in tube current was still possible.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Comparative literature is limited; however, two non-clinical studies on CBCT imaging of the mandibular canal can be noted: Neves et al [28] showed that the region providing best visibility of the canal was the dentulous mandibular region of third molars, and Zaki et al [47], that the tube current necessary for adequate visibility of the canal was higher than otherwise needed in low-dose protocols. Both studies advocated the potential of using dose protocols tailored to the purpose of the investigation, since Zaki et al [47], opined that some reduction in tube current was still possible. This is consistent with the suggestions of Pauwels et al [21,43] that exposure protocols should be selected according to diagnostic requirements for the level of contrast and detail.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%