2011
DOI: 10.3109/14653249.2010.542455
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of cell-seeding density on the proliferation and gene expression profile of human umbilical vein endothelial cells within ex vivo culture

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
20
1

Year Published

2014
2014
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 34 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
1
20
1
Order By: Relevance
“…However, the difference with bare ePET was less marked, probably due to the fact that large numbers of cells were seeded, 10 6 cells per mat. It has been reported that the influence of the substrate on cell adhesion can be reduced when cell density is very high, possibly due to cell–cell interactions that may dominate over those with the substrate. After exposure to shear, cell densities were significantly greater on ePET‐LPPE:N than on bare (ePET) samples ( p < 0.05), as also confirmed by SEM observation (Figure ).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the difference with bare ePET was less marked, probably due to the fact that large numbers of cells were seeded, 10 6 cells per mat. It has been reported that the influence of the substrate on cell adhesion can be reduced when cell density is very high, possibly due to cell–cell interactions that may dominate over those with the substrate. After exposure to shear, cell densities were significantly greater on ePET‐LPPE:N than on bare (ePET) samples ( p < 0.05), as also confirmed by SEM observation (Figure ).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This could result in lower proliferation rates than expected. 45 Although cell counts were initially lower on the 3D scaffolds, the maturation of MG63 and human osteoblasts was enhanced. This finding is consistent with previous studies reporting that osteoblastic proliferation and differentiation are reversely correlated, which means when proliferation rate is high, the differentiation state is reduced.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…The difference in the experimental conditions, particularly initial cell seeding densities, could help explain the variable results of different studies. In particular, a recent study showed that HUVEC proliferation depends highly on the cell seeding density, and even a small increase of cell density might inhibit proliferation [26]. The diversity of nicotine effects might also be explained by the fact that ECs express a variety of nicotinic acetylcholine receptors which might differently regulate various cellular functions [27].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%