2021
DOI: 10.4012/dmj.2020-408
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of cement space on marginal discrepancy and retention of CAD/CAM crown

Abstract: This research aimed to evaluate the effect of cement space on the marginal discrepancy and retention of computer-aided design/ computer-aided manufacturing (CAD/CAM) crowns. A total of 30 premolar Frasaco teeth were machined to receive crowns with cement spaces of 70, 90, and 110 μm. The marginal discrepancy measurements were done before and after cementation. Pull-off test was conducted using universal testing machine (UTM). Data was analyzed using two-way mixed ANOVA with post-hoc Bonferroni test and Kruskal… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

1
2
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
1
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The findings are consistent with those of a previous report [8]. It can be assumed that when restorations are placed in narrow cement spaces, the resin luting agents are subjected to a higher internal pressure, and this pressure results in heightened resistance and reduced outflow of excess luting material [16].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…The findings are consistent with those of a previous report [8]. It can be assumed that when restorations are placed in narrow cement spaces, the resin luting agents are subjected to a higher internal pressure, and this pressure results in heightened resistance and reduced outflow of excess luting material [16].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…The space provided for the cementing agent has a direct effect on differences in marginal discrepancy. The choice of cement spacing less than 40 µm prevents the crown from setting, resulting in increased marginal discrepancy [ 53 ]. This study utilized the silicon replica technique (SRT), which is less expensive, simple to use, precise, and repeatable rapidly without loss of precision.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…According to the manufacturer, the thickness of the sol-gel coatings ranges from 0.5 to 2.0 μm. Compared to the cement space 30-120 μm [45], it is thin enough and will not interfere with the fit. Our previous retrospective clinical research showed that 97.8% self-glazed zirconia single crowns could be accepted with minimal or without any adjustment [46].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%