2012
DOI: 10.1016/s1003-9953(11)60422-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of CeO2 addition on Ni/Al2O3 catalysts for methanation of carbon dioxide with hydrogen

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
96
0
4

Year Published

2016
2016
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 195 publications
(102 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
2
96
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…By comparison: (i) Ando et al reported a 56% CO 2 conversion with 98% CH 4 selectivity at 300 • C for a neat LaNi 5 catalyst prepared by arc melting (pressure = 1 atm, H 2 :CO 2 ratio = 4:1, WHSV = 3000 mL·h −1 ·g −1 cat.) [18]; (ii) Liu et al reported a 45% CO 2 conversion with 99% CH 4 selectivity at 300 • C for a Ni/Al 2 O 3 catalyst prepared by impregnation (pressure = 1 atm, H 2 :CO 2 ratio = 4:1, WHSV = 15,000 mL·h −1 ·g −1 cat., 15 wt % Ni loading) [39]; and (iii) Abelló et al reported a 8% CO 2 conversion with 95% CH 4 selectivity at 300 • C for a Ni 6 Al (reduced) catalyst prepared by co-precipitation (pressure = 5 atm, H 2 :CO 2 ratio = 4:1, WHSV = 26.88 × 10 5 mL·h −1 ·g −1 cat., 69.1 wt % Ni loading) [38]. The stability profile also showed that an initial induction period (~90 min) was needed prior to the catalyst reaching a stable and maximum activity.…”
Section: Catalyst Performancementioning
confidence: 99%
“…By comparison: (i) Ando et al reported a 56% CO 2 conversion with 98% CH 4 selectivity at 300 • C for a neat LaNi 5 catalyst prepared by arc melting (pressure = 1 atm, H 2 :CO 2 ratio = 4:1, WHSV = 3000 mL·h −1 ·g −1 cat.) [18]; (ii) Liu et al reported a 45% CO 2 conversion with 99% CH 4 selectivity at 300 • C for a Ni/Al 2 O 3 catalyst prepared by impregnation (pressure = 1 atm, H 2 :CO 2 ratio = 4:1, WHSV = 15,000 mL·h −1 ·g −1 cat., 15 wt % Ni loading) [39]; and (iii) Abelló et al reported a 8% CO 2 conversion with 95% CH 4 selectivity at 300 • C for a Ni 6 Al (reduced) catalyst prepared by co-precipitation (pressure = 5 atm, H 2 :CO 2 ratio = 4:1, WHSV = 26.88 × 10 5 mL·h −1 ·g −1 cat., 69.1 wt % Ni loading) [38]. The stability profile also showed that an initial induction period (~90 min) was needed prior to the catalyst reaching a stable and maximum activity.…”
Section: Catalyst Performancementioning
confidence: 99%
“…CH 4 selectivity, independently from the CeO 2 content, is higher than 99%. Stability was measured for a reaction time up to 120 h [103]. In [104], the effect of different promoters (CeO 2 , MnO 2 , IrO 2 , La 2 O 3 ) on the catalytic performance of Ni supported on Al 2 O 3 mesoporous nanoparticles was investigated.…”
Section: Alumina-supported Nickelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While CO 2 methanation catalysts based on noble metals such as Rh or Ru do not normally present sintering problems, Ni, Cu or Co based samples, among others, are more susceptible to metal particles agglomeration and aggregation, leading to significant effects on the dispersion. In this context, several works reported the beneficial effect of adding transition metals, noble metals, lanthanides or even alkali earth metals in partially suppressing Ni particles sintering ,,,,,,,,. Among all, Ce has been the most commonly used,,,,,,,, mainly due to its effects, not only on the dispersion of the metallic species (from ∼19 to ∼3 nm Ni 0 particles in 5 %Ni/USY and 5 %Ni‐3 %Ce/USY catalysts, respectively), but also due to the favoured activation of CO 2 over Ce species, as it will be further discussed later.…”
Section: Relevant Properties Of Zeolites For Co2 Methanationmentioning
confidence: 99%