2012
DOI: 10.4067/s0718-95162012000100001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of cerium on growth, dry matter production, biochemical constituents and enzymatic activities of cowpea plants [Vigna unguiculata (L.) Walp.]

Abstract: A pot culture experiment was conducted to study the effect of various concentrations of cerium provided as cerium nitrate (0.713, 3.568, 17.841, 89.206 and 446.030 µM) on the growth performance, dry matter production, biochemical constituents and enzymatic activity of cowpea plants [Vigna unguiculata (L.) Walp.]. Low concentrations of cerium were observed to be beneficial for the test plants. A positive correlation was observed between a lower level of cerium (0.713-17.841 µM) and foliar chlorophyll content,… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

8
37
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 63 publications
(45 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
8
37
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Although in kidney beans there was a slight decrease in shoot length when grown in OMES, but the variation was not significantly different, compared to control plants. As seen in SM Table S3, the increase in leaf cover area in plants grown in nano-CeO 2 amended LOMS could be attributed to beneficial or growth enhancement effects of Ce ions up to certain concentrations (Weiping et al, 2003;Yuguan et al, 2009;Shyam and Aery, 2012;Thomas et al, 2014). However, the leaf count and cover area in OMES plants was unaffected by nano-CeO 2 exposure, similar to previous findings in soybean, corn, and cucumber plants (Priester et al, 2012;Zhao et al, 2013Zhao et al, , 2015 grown in unenriched soils.…”
Section: Impact Of Nano-ceo 2 On Plant Growthsupporting
confidence: 86%
“…Although in kidney beans there was a slight decrease in shoot length when grown in OMES, but the variation was not significantly different, compared to control plants. As seen in SM Table S3, the increase in leaf cover area in plants grown in nano-CeO 2 amended LOMS could be attributed to beneficial or growth enhancement effects of Ce ions up to certain concentrations (Weiping et al, 2003;Yuguan et al, 2009;Shyam and Aery, 2012;Thomas et al, 2014). However, the leaf count and cover area in OMES plants was unaffected by nano-CeO 2 exposure, similar to previous findings in soybean, corn, and cucumber plants (Priester et al, 2012;Zhao et al, 2013Zhao et al, , 2015 grown in unenriched soils.…”
Section: Impact Of Nano-ceo 2 On Plant Growthsupporting
confidence: 86%
“…In Vigna unguiculata seedlings, Shyam and Aery [23] indicate that certain low concentrations (0.7-17.8 μM) of cerium nitrate enhanced both the root and shoot growth. López-Moreno et al [8,12] found that root growth was reduced in the soybean (Glycine max), alfalfa, and tomato, but on the contrary, root growth was significantly promoted in cucumber and maize.…”
Section: Effect Of Ceo 2 Particles On Root and Hypocotyl Elongationmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…It has been reported that REE have a positive effect on water use efficiency by plants due to an increase in the content of proline, an amino acid with a high ability for hydration, which makes the plant more resistant to water stresses [108,110,111]. There are also studies reporting the advantages of increased proline content in the presence of REE, eliminating reactive oxygen species (ROS) and promoting the inhibition of lipid peroxidation [109,112].…”
Section: Water Use Efficiencymentioning
confidence: 99%