Effect of Changing Electronic Health Record Opioid Analgesic Dispense Quantity Defaults on the Quantity Prescribed

Abstract

IMPORTANCE Interventions to improve judicious prescribing of opioid analgesics for acute pain are needed owing to the risks of diversion, misuse, and overdose. OBJECTIVE To assess the effect of modifying opioid analgesic prescribing defaults in the electronic health record (EHR) on prescribing and health service use. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTSA cluster randomized clinical trial with 2 parallel arms was conducted between June 13, 2016, and June 13, 2018, in a large urban health care system comprising 32 primary care and 4 emergency department (ED) sites in the Bronx, New York. Data were analyzed using a difference-in-differences method from 6 months before implementation through 18 months after implementation. Data were analyzed from January 2019 to February 2020. INTERVENTIONS A default dispense quantity for new opioid analgesic prescriptions of 10 tablets (intervention) vs no change (control) in the EHR. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES The primary outcome was the quantity of opioid analgesics prescribed with the new default prescription. Secondary outcomes were opioid analgesic reorders and health service use within 30 days after the new prescription. Intention-to-treat analysis was conducted. RESULTS Overall, 21 331 patients received a new opioid analgesic prescription from 490 prescribers.Comparing the intervention and control arms, site, prescriber, and patient characteristics were similar. For the new prescription, compared with the control arm, patients in the intervention arm had significantly more prescriptions for 10 tablets or fewer (7.6 percentage points; 95% CI, 6.1-9.2 percentage points), a lower number of tablets prescribed (−2.1 tablets; 95% CI, −3.3 to −0.9 tablets), and lower morphine milligram equivalents (MME) prescribed (−14.6 MME; 95% CI, −22.6 to −6.6 MME). Within 30 days after the new prescription, significant differences remained in the number of tablets prescribed (−2.7 tablets; 95% CI, −4.8 to −0.6 tablets), but not MME (−15.8 MME; 95% CI, −33.8 to 2.2 MME). Within this 30-day period, there were no significant differences between the arms in health service use. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCEIn this study, implementation of a uniform reduced default dispense quantity of 10 tablets for opioid analgesic prescriptions led to a modest reduction in the quantity prescribed initially, without significantly increasing health service use. However, during 30 days after implementation, the influence on prescribing was mixed. Reducing EHR default dispense (continued) Key Points Question Does reducing the default number of tablets for opioid analgesic prescriptions in the electronic health record influence prescribing or other outcomes? Findings In this cluster randomized clinical trial of 32 primary care and 4 emergency department sites, with a total of 21 331 prescriptions, a reduced uniform default dispense quantity of 10 tablets led to an increase in the percentage of prescriptions for 10 tablets or fewer (7.6 percentage points). No significant difference in health service use was noted. Meaning Find...

Association Between Default Number of Opioid Doses in Electronic Health Record Systems and Opioid Prescribing to Adolescents and Young Adults Undergoing Tonsillectomy

“…Several studies suggest that implementing default dosing settings or lowering preexisting settings for opioid prescriptions can reduce opioid prescribing in several clinical settings, including surgery. 12 , 13 , 14 , 15 , 16 , 17 , 18 , 19 , 20 Although important, these studies had limitations. First, most either failed to measure patient-reported outcomes or measured only a limited number of these outcomes, precluding rigorous assessment for unintended effects.…”

“…Several studies suggest that implementing default dosing settings or lowering preexisting settings for opioid prescriptions can reduce opioid prescribing in several clinical settings, including surgery . Although important, these studies had limitations.…”

What works for and what hinders deimplementation of low-value care in emergency medicine practice? A scoping review

“…Interventions were reported to be effective in deimplementing low value care in 86% (123/143) of studies, ineffective82 103 108–118 in 9.8% (14/143) studies and variably effective89 102 119–122 in 4.2% (6/143) studies. The effectiveness of interventions in studies was similar across sample sizes, (86.3% (63/73) if n<1000 vs 97% (66/68) if n>1000), participant sites (87.7% (50/57) in multisite vs 92% (79/86) in single site) and documented use of behavioural change theories (93.7% (15/16) when present vs 94.5% (120/127)) when absent).…”

“…Of the included studies, 60% (12/20) of quantitative randomised,82 102 108 110 118 124–130 16.3% (20/123) of quantitative non-randomised,84 85 90 121 131–146 62.5% (5/8) of quantitative descriptive,61 62 64–66 100% (12/12) of qualitative48–57 and 25% (1/4) of mixed methods studies68 were assessed as being of higher quality. Among studies evaluating interventions, 21% (30/143) were of higher quality.…”

Surgeons’ Perspectives on Changing the Default Number of Doses for Opioid Prescriptions in Electronic Health Record Systems

“… 1 , 2 Consequently, rightsizing opioid prescriptions written for tonsillectomy could substantially decrease the number of leftover opioids available for misuse by adolescents and young adults. 3 A promising approach to achieve this goal may be to implement evidence-based default settings for the number of doses in opioid prescriptions written through electronic health record (EHR) systems, 4 , 5 , 6 , 7 , 8 , 9 , 10 , 11 , 12 the primary means by which controlled substances are prescribed in the US. 13 This approach has several advantages, including low implementation costs and the preservation of clinician autonomy, the latter of which may increase clinician support.…”