2008
DOI: 10.1016/j.seppur.2007.05.034
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of characteristics of activated carbon on removal of bromate

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
49
1

Year Published

2009
2009
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 87 publications
(51 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
1
49
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Thus, an efficient technology is required for bromate removal from drinking water. There are some chemical and physical methods for the removal of bromate from drinking water such as reduction using zero-valent iron (Fe 0 ) [6,7], reduction with Fe 2+ [8,9], and SO 3 2− [9], adsorption and reduction by granular activated carbon [10][11][12], ionic exchange [13,14], filtering by reverse osmosis membrane [15], UV irradiation [16], high-energy electron beam (HEEB) irradiation [17]. The applicability of most of these methods on commercial scale is limited due to high operational and maintenance costs, secondary pollution and complicated procedure involved in the treatment.…”
Section: Bromate (Bromentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Thus, an efficient technology is required for bromate removal from drinking water. There are some chemical and physical methods for the removal of bromate from drinking water such as reduction using zero-valent iron (Fe 0 ) [6,7], reduction with Fe 2+ [8,9], and SO 3 2− [9], adsorption and reduction by granular activated carbon [10][11][12], ionic exchange [13,14], filtering by reverse osmosis membrane [15], UV irradiation [16], high-energy electron beam (HEEB) irradiation [17]. The applicability of most of these methods on commercial scale is limited due to high operational and maintenance costs, secondary pollution and complicated procedure involved in the treatment.…”
Section: Bromate (Bromentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1) therefore, the equilibration period of 60 min was selected for further experiments. The results indicate that bromate shows fast kinetics onto GFH compared to the other conventional adsorbents, such as Granular Activated Carbons (GACs) and Powdered Activated Carbons (PACs), which show longer equilibration time from 4 h to 20 h [8,12,17].…”
Section: Effect Of Contact Time and Initial Bromate Concentrationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The technologies that involve sorption have proven to be successful at removing different types of inorganic anions, as shown by Wajima et al (2009);Liao and Shi (2005) and Viswanathan and Meenakshi (2010) in the removal of fluorine, Namasivayam and Sangeetha (2005) in nitrate removal, Huang and Cheng (2008) and Bhatnagar et al (2009) in the re-moval of bromate, Parette and Cannon (2005), Xie et al (2010) and Mahmudor and Huang (2010) in the removal of perchlorate. All these studies used aqueous solutions and various materials as sorbents.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Taste and odor compounds are considered to be susceptible for the removal by • OH [11]. Although ozonation is an effective treatment option for the removal of taste and odor compounds, the formation of the hazardous by-product bromate must be controlled [12]. To overcome this drawback, ozonation processes are being modified in order to increase their oxidizing capability.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%