2012
DOI: 10.1179/2045772312y.0000000013
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of choice of recovery patterns on handrim kinetics in manual wheelchair users with paraplegia and tetraplegia

Abstract: Background: Impact forces experienced by the upper limb at the beginning of each wheelchair propulsion (WCP) cycle are among the highest forces experienced by wheelchair users. Objective: To determine whether the magnitude of hand/forearm velocity prior to impact and effectiveness of rim impact force are dependent on the type of hand trajectory pattern chosen by the user during WCP. Avoiding patterns that inherently cause higher impact force and have lower effectiveness can be another step towards preserving u… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

2
8
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
2
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The mean spatial-temporal wheelchair propulsion parameters observed in this investigation were consistent with previous literature (Boninger et al, 1997, Shimada et al, 1998, Boninger et al, 2002, Collinger et al, 2008, Richter et al, 2011, Raina, S et al, 2012, Slowik, J.S et al, 2015). This benchmarking was essential to suggest that the observations from our investigation are generalizable and qualitative comparison of our results with previous literature is acceptable.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…The mean spatial-temporal wheelchair propulsion parameters observed in this investigation were consistent with previous literature (Boninger et al, 1997, Shimada et al, 1998, Boninger et al, 2002, Collinger et al, 2008, Richter et al, 2011, Raina, S et al, 2012, Slowik, J.S et al, 2015). This benchmarking was essential to suggest that the observations from our investigation are generalizable and qualitative comparison of our results with previous literature is acceptable.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…While differences in individual anthropometrics, strength and functional capacity among wheelchair users may prevent the identification of a single optimal hand pattern for all subjects (Raina et al, 2012), task-specific constraints and required upper extremity demand likely preclude the existence of a single optimal hand pattern for all tasks (Richter et al, 2007). …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…2). For the free condition, subjects performed level propulsion at their self-selected free speed (mean = 1.04 m/s, SD = 0.30 m/s) with the resistance level set similar to overground propulsion over a tile surface (e.g., Raina et al, 2012). For the fast condition, subjects performed level propulsion at their fastest comfortable speed (mean = 1.90 m/s, SD = 0.46 m/s).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Cognitive and psychological impairments such as de cits in attention and memory as well as depression and anxiety may negatively affect motor learning processes [57][58][59][60][61]. Additionally, acquisition of ideal propulsion technique may be hindered in many MWC users due to upper body motor impairments, such as limited trunk control and reduced grip strength [62,63]. For these reasons, ndings from this study may not translate directly to a clinical population of wheelchair users.…”
Section: Study Limitationsmentioning
confidence: 93%