2012
DOI: 10.1002/lary.23336
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of cisplatin on distortion product otoacoustic emissions in Japanese patients

Abstract: Our data suggest that Japanese patients are more susceptible to cisplatin-induced ototoxicity. This is presumably caused by a genetic difference.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

2
24
0
3

Year Published

2014
2014
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(29 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
2
24
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…[6,9,10] In a recent study investigating a cohort of Japanese head and neck cancer patients, the threshold cumulative dosage of cisplatin was 200 mg/m 2 , above which average hearing thresholds were significantly reduced in these patients. [11] Our data indicate that SA patients who received higher cumulative cisplatin dosages during chemotherapy were more likely to develop significant hearing loss, with median cumulative dosages of 180.70 mg/m 2 and 236.84 mg/m 2 for the ototoxicity-free and ototoxicity groups, respectively. Our findings therefore suggest that cumulative cisplatin dosage may be the most important predictor of ototoxcity in this population.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 63%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…[6,9,10] In a recent study investigating a cohort of Japanese head and neck cancer patients, the threshold cumulative dosage of cisplatin was 200 mg/m 2 , above which average hearing thresholds were significantly reduced in these patients. [11] Our data indicate that SA patients who received higher cumulative cisplatin dosages during chemotherapy were more likely to develop significant hearing loss, with median cumulative dosages of 180.70 mg/m 2 and 236.84 mg/m 2 for the ototoxicity-free and ototoxicity groups, respectively. Our findings therefore suggest that cumulative cisplatin dosage may be the most important predictor of ototoxcity in this population.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 63%
“…The incidence rate of cisplatin-induced ototoxicity was reported as 77.3% in the 44 Japanese patients investigated. [11] No clinically proven treatments for the prevention or amelioration of ototoxicity exist, although recent studies have highlighted the value of co-administration of cisplatin with otoprotectors such as D-methionine. [12] However, the development of ototoxicity remains the most significant dose-limiting factor in cisplatin-based chemotherapy owing to the cumulative, and often irreversible, manner in which it develops.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Secondly, OAE does not quantify hearing loss or hearing threshold level because normal OAE responses are not obtained if hearing thresholds are approximately 30-40 dB HL or higher, on the contrary they are more sensitive to detect cochlear damage than conventional pure-tone audiometry [Al Noury, 2011]. Third, distortion product OAEs are objective, rapid and noninvasive, reproducible and a stable test [Dhooge et al, 2006;Zimatore et al, 2011;Eiamprapai et al, 2012]. Unfortunately, in children, the application of OAEs is limited in the presence of middle ear dysfunction and due to the lack of scales for the classification of hearing impairment in oncological patients.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The reported rate of cisplatin-induced hearing loss ranges between 11% and 97%, with an average incidence of 62%. [2][3][4] Additionally, cisplatin-induced ototoxicity is more prevalent in children, affecting up to 90% of pediatric patients. 5 Hearing loss is a common cause for depression and reduction in quality of life, 6 and thus prevention…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%