2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2022.114847
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of cleaner residential heating policy on air pollution: A case study in Shandong Province, China

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 52 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The Chinese government has adopted a series of policies to combat severe air pollution. For example, scholars have investigated the effectiveness of the clean winter heating policy in China [ 33 , 36 ]. Some scholars estimated that the net treatment effect of the clean winter heating policy would alleviate 3.4 μg/m 3 of PM 2.5 concentrations, the reduction effect of which is close to the carbon trading observed in this study [ 37 ].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The Chinese government has adopted a series of policies to combat severe air pollution. For example, scholars have investigated the effectiveness of the clean winter heating policy in China [ 33 , 36 ]. Some scholars estimated that the net treatment effect of the clean winter heating policy would alleviate 3.4 μg/m 3 of PM 2.5 concentrations, the reduction effect of which is close to the carbon trading observed in this study [ 37 ].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although the DID model has obvious advantages in identifying the causal effect, it is sometimes uneasy to find a similar control group since the only difference between the treated and control groups should be exposed to the policy intervention. Compared with other methods, the advantage of the DID model is more evident and it can estimate the effect of a specific intervention or treatment by comparing changes in outcomes over time [ 33 ]. Therefore, we set the DID specifications as follows: where is the prefecture-level city and includes both those implementing and those not implementing the carbon trading policy in China; is the year variable ranging from 2007 to 2018; is the dependent variable of the PM 2.5 concentration; is an interaction term that multiplies with , where is an indicator variable that implies whether or not a city implements the carbon trading policy; is a year dummy variable indicating that the will be 1 during the carbon trading policy period, otherwise it will be 0; lastly, is a series of control variables that may affect the PM 2.5 concentration, including the population, proportion of secondary industrial added values, share of green land areas, number of industrial firms, per capita GDP, foreign direct investment, annual shine hours, annual average temperature, and annual precipitation.…”
Section: Methodology and Datamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The advantage of this approach is that it can estimate the effect of a specific intervention or treatment by comparing changes in outcomes over time. Many scholars used the DID method to investigate China's clean winter heating policy (Weng et al, 2021;Weng et al, 2022) and air pollution control policy (He et al, 2020;Zhang et al, 2021).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is reported that rural households consumed approximately 110 million tons of raw coal in 2018 in China [10]. As a major proportion of rural households in China require heating during winter, the abundant use of scattered coal poses serious threats on air quality, public health and climate change [11]. Moreover, centralized heating is usually not applicable for rural areas in Northen China, as the households are commonly scattered.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%