Background: In August 2016, Miami-Dade County implemented Zika intervention strategies to combat a dramatic increase in incidence. Encouragingly, there was a significant decrease; howbeit, the effectiveness of these interventions remains unclear, and many countries in the world still suffer from various vector-borne diseases.Methods: To evaluate emerging vector-borne disease intervention strategies, we propose a Susceptible–Exposed–Infectious–Recovered Intervention Model (SEIR-IM) and apply the model to the 2016 Zika outbreak in Miami-Dade County, Florida as a case study. The proposed model allows for the impacts of the interventions on the transmission cycle of vector-borne diseases, and is parameterized by the Markov Chain Monte Carlo (MCMC).Results: Within the exiting literature, we find that vector-borne disease intervention strategies promote disease control in the context of human, vector, and human-vector contact. Overall, during the course of interventions, the transmission probability of humans decreases from 0.417 to 0.38 versus mosquitoes from 0.418 to 0.19. Through further analysis, the host-based controls are able to reduce the human infections to 27, while the vector-based controls are 50. On the basis of analysis of the human infections at high intervention coverage, in particular, continued scale-up of the interventions from baseline, we find that the interventions at higher coverage lead to an earlier but higher infection peak: 20 more infections and 100 days in advance.Conclusions: The three interventions result in a remarkable decline of the Zika infection in Miami-Dade County, and the host-based and contact- based controls are the most effective in reducing Zika incidence.