2010
DOI: 10.1007/s10021-010-9357-y
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of Climate on Wildfire Size: A Cross-Scale Analysis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

3
58
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 57 publications
(61 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
3
58
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In order to get a more complete assessment of how fire size responded to our predictor variables of interest, we used a modelling technique called quantile regression to assess the relationships between fire size distribution and the precipitation, N deposition and biomass variables. Quantile regression (Koenker and Bassett 1978) estimates the effects of explanatory variables for different portions of the distribution of a response variable, rather than just modelling the mean response, and has been shown to be a useful technique for analysing a variety of ecological datasets (Cade and Noon 2003), including identifying relationships between wildfire size and climate variables (Slocum et al 2010). A series of modelling functions is estimated at different levels of t, with t representing the fractions of expected response values (e.g.…”
Section: Statistical Analysesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In order to get a more complete assessment of how fire size responded to our predictor variables of interest, we used a modelling technique called quantile regression to assess the relationships between fire size distribution and the precipitation, N deposition and biomass variables. Quantile regression (Koenker and Bassett 1978) estimates the effects of explanatory variables for different portions of the distribution of a response variable, rather than just modelling the mean response, and has been shown to be a useful technique for analysing a variety of ecological datasets (Cade and Noon 2003), including identifying relationships between wildfire size and climate variables (Slocum et al 2010). A series of modelling functions is estimated at different levels of t, with t representing the fractions of expected response values (e.g.…”
Section: Statistical Analysesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…High-frequency fire regimes ( 3 years; Huffman 2006, Stambaugh et al 2011) are recognized as a keystone process in the LLPE and a crucial reference condition for restoring and conserving the LLPE (Aschenbach et al 2010). The natural fire regime required a high degree of landscape connectivity that resulted from interactions among regional topography (van Lear et al 2005) and firefacilitating vegetation (Beckage et al 2005) that encouraged fires to burn for extended periods of time and, under favorable climatic conditions, to spread over vast areas (Slocum et al 2010a). An emergent property of this landscape dynamic was a fire feedback that increased the frequency an area burned by allowing ignition sources to occur at great distances (Beckage et al 2005, van Lear et al 2005.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Alternatively, there may be distinct domains of fire behavior associated with particular fire size ranges. Individual fires could shift from one domain of behavior to another once some threshold in fire size has been crossed (Peters et al 2004, Slocum et al 2010. For example, the initial spread of a fire within small patches of vegetation may be influenced primarily by localscale fuel availability (including mass, connectivity, and moisture).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%