2023
DOI: 10.1007/s11666-023-01536-y
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of Coating Thickness on the Bond Strength of Cold-Sprayed Ni-Based cBN Coating on 42CrMo Substrate

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2025
2025

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 28 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This means that the actual bonding strength of the coating should be much higher, but it can hardly be tested owing to the insufficient strength of the glue. It should be mentioned that in the condition without surface roughing treatments, the bonding strength of the sprayed NiAl coating was much higher than coating that relied on pure mechanical bonding effect, i.e., arc sprayed NiAl coating with sand-blasting surface pre-treatment [23,24]. As for the NiAl coating deposited by a high-velocity oxy-fuel (HVOF) process and APS spraying, the most reported adhesive strength of coating was 30-60 MPa [25,26].…”
Section: Bonding Strength Of the Coatingsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This means that the actual bonding strength of the coating should be much higher, but it can hardly be tested owing to the insufficient strength of the glue. It should be mentioned that in the condition without surface roughing treatments, the bonding strength of the sprayed NiAl coating was much higher than coating that relied on pure mechanical bonding effect, i.e., arc sprayed NiAl coating with sand-blasting surface pre-treatment [23,24]. As for the NiAl coating deposited by a high-velocity oxy-fuel (HVOF) process and APS spraying, the most reported adhesive strength of coating was 30-60 MPa [25,26].…”
Section: Bonding Strength Of the Coatingsmentioning
confidence: 99%